Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Joloimpat/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Loves him exactly the same articles and topics: Filipino local politics:, ; and contemporary Catholic saints: , ,. Does not seem to understand how to communicate in English: zero talk page usage, zero edit summaries. Block evasion; IP1 is currently blocked by for two weeks: WP:DE. Elizium23 (talk) 00:11, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * No comment technically, and this is all policy/behaviour based: Okay, so one of these IPs hasn't edited in 2 years, so I don't care. Next, editing mainspace while logged out isn't against policy, unless done to deceive, which isn't the case here. Finally, I'm not going to block an account that's been around since 2012 and has over 4,000 edits for evading a disruptive editing soft block on an IP when their behaviour on the account is currently being discussed at ANI. That isn't what SPI is for. If the behaviour needs to lead to a block, so be it, but it should be on the merits, not for forgetting to log in. This is especially the case as there is a discussion at ANI. Closing with no action, and no comment on the merits of the ANI case, which is where this discussion should take place. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:21, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

(ip1) Same trivial edit messing with "2020" section in List of people beatified by Pope Francis. (ip2) Ditto - same section, same article. Nobody else on this project cares about that article or upcoming events. Are these edits disruptive? Yes, I believe they are: they run afoul of WP:CRYSTAL and there is no particular problem that is solved by adding them early; lately Joloimpat has been adding HTML comments around them so they don't show in the article anymore, but they still could have been added on the day-of the events rather than in advance. I am not alone: indepdenty believes they should not be in the article. Joloimpat and his socks steadfastly refuse to communicate in any way. They never ever use edit summaries, or talk pages. They never respond to our requests to discuss issues. They are an unstoppable force that does not edit collegially or collaboratively, but instead in their own little bubble of gnomish minor inconsequential edits. To edit on Wikipedia without communicating is disruptive by its very nature. To edit while logged out because there is an WP:ANI report against you is avoiding scrutiny. Joloimpat will return to his account once the dust has settled. But his IPv4 sock has already been blocked once for WP:DE and he continued to evade that block. I am also satisfied that he resides in the United States and understands English perfectly well. I have lost my sense of good faith. Elizium23 (talk) 17:54, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Closing with no action, other than leaving a uw-login template on their talk page. Blocking what's almost certainly a mobile IP is pointless, and I agree with 's comments in the archives that SPI isn't the right place for this.  -- RoySmith (talk) 18:21, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Obvious sock is obvious; editing same Filipino government pages and Catholic saint pages as Joloimpat was wont to do. Elizium23 (talk) 04:00, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The IP appears to be in the same range as previous suspected IP socks and certainly displays overlapping interests, that's enough for me. IP blocked one week. GeneralNotability (talk) 17:05, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Identical intersectional interests in list of people beatified/canonized and elections/politics in the Philippines as sockmaster. Elizium23 (talk) 19:42, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Significant overlap in interests, editing from the iOS app, same ISP., . GeneralNotability (talk) 14:50, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Added missing master tag. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:52, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Blocked in September by. See Sockpuppet investigations/Joloimpat/Archive for more evidence. Elizium23 (talk) 05:00, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Reblocked for a month. GeneralNotability (talk) 15:05, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Adding future information to venerable/beatified/saints list articles, loves Philippine local elections and politics, geolocates to East Coast U.S.A. Elizium23 (talk) 20:07, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * From the same 173.66.144.0/20 range as previous reports. Also, geolocates to the same area (suburban northern Virginia) as previously used 108.56.178.201.  Big editing overlap.  Blocking 173.66.154.130 for a month, but if this comes back, we may have to look at a range block.  I'm not enthusiastic about blocking a /20, but let's see where this goes. -- RoySmith (talk) 18:24, 10 January 2021 (UTC)