Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Joseprzprz86/Archive

8 April 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Which is the probability two different editors edit the same pages? The probability is low, and considering those pages are not related, both accounts are the same. They have edited the page Colonia del Valle ( and ) and Alizée-related content. Also, consider the history of Colonia del Valle, IPs from Mexico City are always reverting the removals, and those IPs edit Alizée pages as well:, , , , etc. And, considering the comments by Jose here ("you put the government in a ridicule and you can get problems"), here ("again you, well you are puting a mexican goverment in ridicules and tath is very bad thigh" [sic]), and here ("so for the part of the Mexican government stay hurt for part of Wikipedia with the exhausting try's to destroy the district page ... without considering that you are not living in Mexico") he lives in Mexico City. I have no doubt he is disrupting CdV page with his IPs. If the CU is positive, and considering the long-term abuse from the account and the IPs, I suggest an indefinite block. Tb hotch .™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions.  17:43, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I'm not seeing any abuse here. This looks to me like a casual user who created accounts and then forgot the passwords. Of the three accounts you've listed here, two of them have less than 50 edits. One has been inactive for over 6 months. The master is also pretty much inactive for over 6 months. I don't know why you're filing this now, but I can't see any attempt to avoid scrutiny. Closing. Basa lisk  inspect damage⁄berate 15:45, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
 * You don't see any abuse? And what is this? He has a main account and may has created at least two more, and use IPs to continue edit-warring. This is in the strict sense of SP, an abuse. Tb hotch .™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it!  See terms and conditions.  16:26, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Reopening this because there is overlap between Joseprzprz86 and France63 at least in times the account was used, and on at least one page. I'm not saying that this is abuse for sure (haven't looked too closely) but this isn't "forgot passwords." --Rschen7754 05:21, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The only significant overlap I see is Tbhotch's last link, in this section. It was weeks apart.  There is a possibility that they share living quarters, but the timing of the edits there, weeks apart, makes me not want to jump to the "meatpuppet" side as well.  Currently, it is interesting and worth watching, but I wouldn't say it is clearly abuse yet.  Dennis Brown - 2¢  © Join WER 13:23, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Adding two more from the Alizée page history, the user names alone are suggestive here. I started looking into it yesterday, but first got sidetracked and then my browser crashed and took all tabs with it. I'm certain there is use of multiple accounts. Amalthea  13:41, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I've blocked Jose for a week for socking, and I've blocked the puppets indefinitely. Note also that there is a lot of logged-out editing going on in the 187.191.13.0/24 and 187.191.31.0/24 ranges. Marking for closure. Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:53, 3 May 2013 (UTC)