Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Josh Talk/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
Activated after blocking. The message on the talk page is the same. ( last Active March 2022)


 * https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Uche_Nancy#Contested_deletion_2


 * https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Uche_Nancy#Contested_deletion_3 PravinGanechari (talk) 17:52, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi, All of them are new users who created ID two to three days ago and all of them are contributing to this page Uche Nancy . But it is doubtful that all this group will be the same.
 * > Cartoods
 * > Test360
 * > StupidPingvin
 * > Motozencng
 * > Salem Ander PravinGanechari (talk) 18:21, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
I've added all the users/accounts listed by the filer to the list and requested CU to sort out this rather odd behavior. I should say that there are even more newish accounts editing the article that the filer hasn't listed. Also, it's best to run the CU before deciding who the master is. Finally, I did not block the master for socking, although I mentioned it as a possibility in the block log.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:45, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
 * As far as CU is concerned, these accounts are unrelated to one another. There's something odd going on with all these new accounts showing an interest in the page, but it looks like they're different people from what I can see.  Girth Summit  (blether)  12:44, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Closing with no action, mainly because of the CU results but partly because all but one of the users hasn't edited in over a week (the one edited 3 days ago). Bbb23 (talk) 13:18, 14 August 2022 (UTC)