Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Joshualeverburg1/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

The Gordonpenwick account was created one day after Joshualeverburg1 argued for keep in a deletion discussion for an article he created (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Luke_Brugnara). Gordonpenwick then made its first, and only, contribution, arguing for "keep." The text of the Gordonpenwick account's vote for keep has very similar formatting and grammar as the Joshualeverburg1 account, including spelling "article" as "artical." BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 16:50, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
The suspected puppet hasn't edited in seven years and then edited only twice. Running a check is not possible, and, in any event, I'm not going to take any action against the alleged master even if the puppet is operated by him. To the extent the alleged master is being disruptive, it will have to be handled in a different venue. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:17, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, appreciate the feedback!BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 17:19, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Newly created account. Commentary on talk:Luke Brugnara matches tone and phrasing of blocked user Joshualeverburg1. Reverted ongoing edits to improve Luke Brugnara article and make it NPOV. BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 02:33, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.'' He's also using User:Truthteller1111. -- Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  02:25, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * just before I saw this. Obvious enough that we don't need CU. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:54, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Another sock appears to revert edits on the Luke Brugnara page, claiming that they're "Slander." WP:DUCK to, , etc. BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 12:23, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . GABgab 01:25, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Once again, trying to revert Luke Brugnara to an old, very POV version. WP:DUCK to, , , etc. BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 16:23, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocked and tagged. -- RoySmith (talk) 18:25, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Removed negative information and added puffery to Luke Brugnara (diff here). Looks like WP:DUCK to prior socks of. BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 18:43, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Seems like a sock to me. Blocking and tagging, closing SPI.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   04:19, 30 March 2021 (UTC)