Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Joss Pentoscope/Archive

17 April 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Repeated edits that are identical to work of blocked editor, | Joss Pentoscope. . See also for another blocked sock, User:Deborah Duncan. Logical Cowboy (talk) 15:57, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
I don't see where Joss Pentoscope is blocked. They also have not edited in years. Were you referring to a different account? TN X Man 16:04, 17 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Please see . The IP edits are identical to the edits by the blocked WP:SPA.  For example, compare this one  to this one .  Logical Cowboy (talk) 16:06, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
 * This is confusing -Joss Pentoscope has no listing in their block log of ever having been blocked. TN X Man  16:48, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I can't explain that. But please see this  and this .  Logical Cowboy (talk) 16:53, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Seeing the talk page and FT2's comment i guess his intention was to block the user - guess he missed a button. Wither way, and a clear one at that. Blocked the IP editor for a day for spamming, and procedurally blocked Joss Pentoscope as being supposed to have been blocked.  Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 19:38, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Looks like we're done. TN X Man  20:43, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

02 September 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Same as edit that previously got this sock blocked ]http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Zadie_Smith&diff=prev&oldid=488212720] Logical Cowboy (talk) 22:50, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocked. -- DQ  (ʞlɐʇ)  23:26, 2 September 2012 (UTC)