Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jozefboys/Archive

26 December 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Jozefboys added the copyrighted material to the Jozef van Wissem page claiming to be the subject of the article here. Later, 24.42.67.83 removed another part of the article claiming to be the subject of the article here, here, here, and here. So it's obvious that 24.42.67.83 is Jozefboys' sock. 123.224.99.251 (talk) 17:13, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Another account, Bofs1, was created a few hours ago and he removed a part of the article here in the same manner as Jozefboys and 24.42.67.83 did. 123.224.99.251 (talk) 18:51, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Edit semi-protected Please move this page to the WP space. Thanks. Regards, 123.224.99.251 (talk) 17:13, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done ···V ani s che nu「m/Talk」 20:51, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * With two weeks distance it seems to me the first account was merely abandoned. There are concerns here of course: Switching accounts in that manner is not recommended, editing one's own biography is problematic, but I don't see multiple account abuse here (intention to mislead/disrupt/deceive). Talking with him, informing him of the concerns, with recommendation to redirect the old account to his new one (if they are indeed the same person, the new account hasn't really come out and said so) should be sufficient here. Amalthea  12:21, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I agree with Amalthea and have left notes on the talk pages of the two named editors, directing them to my talk page if there are further questions. Closing. Dennis Brown -  2&cent;    &copy;  Join WER 15:26, 10 January 2013 (UTC)