Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jrrao/Archive

18 March 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Please see user contributions. All of these editors are advocating for very similar changes to Lingam -- removal of scholarly material, addition of poorly sourced religious material. It is possible that some or all of them are sockpuppets of an already-banned user, but I'm not sure. &mdash; goethean 15:27, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments





 * ✅ to be related to each other and Jrrao:



-- Keegan (talk) 04:25, 19 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Clear abuse of multiple accounts, pushing the same edits in the article . I've blocked the confirmed accounts and tagged them as Jrrao. Leaving the stale accounts unblocked at this point as I don't see any clear ducks in the group, although it's certainly possible some of the listed accounts are the same person... Bhvreddy doesn't look related IMHO, although they seem to have also edited logged-out as 197.226.202.70 . Sumit Dhawan is apparently the same as . Omtamil was warned about their username in September 2012 and hasn't edited since˔ Article protection could be worth considering if the problem persists and new accounts keep popping up. Jafeluv (talk) 14:49, 20 March 2013 (UTC)


 * I left a pointer in that archive to this archive. Dennis Brown - 2¢  © Join WER 15:56, 20 March 2013 (UTC)