Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jshan826/Archive

14 December 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Jshan826 started edit warring at Optometry with another editor    and after reverting three times he probably logged out and reverted using IP 64.134.241.54. S M S  Talk 21:47, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I have added IP 74.1.69.130 to the list. The only edit on this account is in support of the user's position on the talk page. Chrisieboy (talk) 22:42, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I don't think there was a particular attempt to evade here, but that said I've blocked Jshan826 for 24 hours on grounds of edit warring. -- DQ  (t)   (e)  11:53, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

28 February 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Latest in a row of sockpuppets edit warring on Optometry. Quacks like a duck. Others have been indefinitely blocked. Chrisieboy (talk) 17:56, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * It's suspicious, but I don't really see enough to block per WP:DUCK. As such I'm endorsing for confirmation and sleepers. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 02:31, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Saying they "quack" does not do me any good at all. I do not have time to dig through all of the accounts contributions, and would greatly appreciate that if in the future you take 2 more minutes and actually post some evidence. Diffs like this and this would be useful. That said, from a purely technical standpoint they appear ❌ (no comment with regards to 72.229.29.229). Honestly though, I could just as much go with given one of them is editing from a cellular device with a very dynamic IP range. If I were the closing administrator, I would go based off of behavioral evidence.  Tiptoety  talk 20:45, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry - to be honest, I couldn't find any edits that clearly match the master. A few other accounts, 3tanman3 and OD.Vision, are blocked as suspected socks, but I wasn't sure that this was related. Closing for now, but relist if there's more evidence. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 22:05, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

06 March 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Obvious sock of an indefinitely blocked user, continuing a slow-burning edit war on Optometry with impunity. See here and here and here and here, the edit histories of the sockpuppet accounts and/or the revision history of the article. Please also compare comments left on the article's talk page, my talk page and that of User:Favonian. Chrisieboy (talk) 10:26, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Please see the archive for this case -this account was already investigated. TN X Man 14:28, 6 March 2012 (UTC)