Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jspeed1310/Archive

08 December 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility


 * Jspeed1310 and his puppet account Alphama and his 2 Vietnamese IPs both attempted to eliminate the Người Bắc Kỳ article 5 times within a 8-hour period, on Dec.7.2013. First, Jspeed tried to blank the article and replace with a redirect to the Vietnamese people article at UTC 5:54. When I reverted it because his edit reason was invalid, Jspeed redid his article blanking at UTC 8:34. Then, he logged out and used IP 113.172.224.235 (from Ho Chi Minh city, Vietnam) to speedy delete the article at 10:25. After, Jspeed used Hanoi IP 113.22.28.205 to make another speedy delete at 11:30. He used his puppet account Alphama to issue yet another speedy delete at 13:12. Deletion requests were denied by Jni, concluding that "I declined to speedily delete this. This is because there is non-trivial editing history and the debate seems to be about the content of the article, or whether or not it should be a redirect pointing somewhere, and discussion already involves arguments that go way beyond what is typical for CSDs. The request also did not match any of the CSD criterias. Further blanking of this article/redirect should be considered as vandalism and reverted" at 9:41, Dec.7.
 * Jspeed also requested speedy deletion of the Dân Bắc Kỳ article within this 8-hour period (article was recently deleted by user Amatulic, 5 hours before this SPI was filed).
 * Jspeed has a long-running vendetta against the and Dân Bắc Kỳ and Người Bắc Kỳ articles, as he tried to blank the Dan Bac Ky article numerous times (~7 times) and replace with redirect to Vietnamese people article, each time with no edit summary whatsoever, starting from January 2013 till yesterday. When he found Nguoi Bac Ky, he started blanking and redirecting that article as well. (I can no longer retrieve the Dân Bắc Kỳ's edit history because it's deleted)
 * It is obvious that Alphama and the 2 IPs are from Jspeed, as they all engage in the same activity (speedy-deleting the 2 articles) at the same time, exactly matching the timing of Jspeed's article blanking campaign, all with the intent of eliminating those 2 articles. Vantungk35 article-blanked and vandalized Dan Bac Ky article late last month, blanking and vandalized by inserting this following text " dân nam kỳ chỉ biết phá hoại, gái nam kỳ chỉ biết làm đĩ nuôi chồng " (translated: Southern Vietnamese people only know how to vandalize all the time, southern Vietnamese women only know to be whores and care for their husbands")(I posted that quote on user Vsmith's talk page yesterday, when I still had access to the Dan Bac Ky article diff history, and reference to the vandalism can be found here).
 * The IPs and 3 useraccounts all come from the same country, same person. Jspeed is a resident of Hanoi, (as declared on his Vietnamese wiki user page "Thành viên này sống tại thủ đô Hà Nội" = "This user lives in the capital Hanoi"). IPs are from Vietnam. The accounts Alphama and Jspeed both edit on many Vietnam-related articles. The 3 useraccounts and 2 IPs lack edit summaries on the majority of their edits due to their low proficiency in using the English language, as admitted by Jspeed when he says "sorry, my english is bad" on here at the last sentence.
 * I already confronted Jspeed about his sockpuppetry here, and he has never denied or contested this.
 * More background info can be found here if needed. If Checkuser is needed to find more relationships between the 3 useraccounts and 2 IPs, please feel free to do so. However i must warn, the IPs used by all 5 are likely proxies - no one can be in Saigon in 1 hour then magically be in Hanoi the next hour.
 * EDIT: As well, watch if Jspeed and Alphama change/manipulate their IPs, they're probably doing it based on their conversations on Viwiki.

Thank you in advance for your time and consideration. Nguyễn Quốc Việt (talk) 07:37, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.'' LOL, i'm waiting :D.Jspeed1310 (talk) 08:02, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
 * See, proof of trolling too. Nguyễn Quốc Việt (talk) 08:35, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

take it easy, boy.Jspeed1310 (talk) 08:47, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
 * you mean this conversations:"bác sửa cái gì để tay này bây giờ nghĩ tôi với bác là 1 thế :D" (what did you edit to make that guy thinks me and you are 1 :D), i thought you understand vietnamese.Jspeed1310 (talk) 08:46, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
 * you think i don't know what you're up to? Nguyễn Quốc Việt (talk) 08:49, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

watch if Jspeed and Alphama change/manipulate their IPs, they're probably doing it based on their conversations on Viwiki. what did you mean in this sentence, i thought we are 1.Jspeed1310 (talk) 08:56, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, you change IPs on one or both accounts to make you look like as if you're 2 different people. Don't think you can play games to fool other Vietnamese. Nguyễn Quốc Việt (talk) 08:59, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

=v= :).Jspeed1310 (talk) 09:01, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi there, admin can check freely my account. I am a reputed member in Vietnamese Wikipedia project with more than +30.000 edits and +100.000 edits by using bot (AlphamaBot). Furthermore, currently I do not live in Vietnam. I did revert the redirects of two articles (Dan Bac Ky and Dân Bắc Kỳ) because they are not correct simply. The two redirects just mention to the North of Vietnam not all Vietnamese people. You can check the content of that article. User Nguyễn Quốc Việt seemly accused me and slowed down the quality of Wikipedia. I myself doubted his contributions were not neutral. Thank you! Alphama (talk) 10:10, 8 December 2013 (UTC)


 * The point of the article is to provide a summary of contemporary northern Vietnamese history, geography, terminology (3 of them) and account for migrations of northern Vietnamese to other parts of the country, it is not political piece. The article was created in a no more different manner as articles like North China, or Northern Germany or Southern Egypt, and is in line with corresponding Vietnamese article, Bắc Kỳ. As for the migrations and "New Economic Zones", they are true and actual historical events, and are supported by well-accepted sources that are used elsewhere on Vietnam history articles on English wiki, and it is a very short English version of the Viet version article "Xây dựng các vùng kinh tế mới". As for the, rather unfortunate, use by some southern Vietnamese of using the term "Bac Ky" derogatorially, yes it's unfortunate, but it is a reality and the article simply states that, just as how Kraut or Jap or Chink are used by some Western lowlifes to refer to German, Japanese and Chinese people in a derogatory manner. And, the article never says or implies that northern Vietnamese are a "different ethnicity", which is absolutely wrong. To blame that the article implies that, following that kind of logic, the many other regional articles in wiki, like the 3 exampled above, might as well be accused of making northern Germans, or northern Han Chinese, or southern Egyptians as "separate ethnicities". Nguyễn Quốc Việt (talk) 13:27, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
 * You should continue this discussion in Vietnamese people article. Alphama (talk) 15:05, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

did you read my comment, this article, you may keep, but you can't use it when you say about northern vietnamese ((1, 2, 3)). itself is just a term used by southern vietnamese like jap, Kraut or Chink used by western. it can't replace for Japanese people, Chinese people or northern vietnamese people.btw, i don't see much of difference between northern, central, southern vietnamese to having multiple articles.Jspeed1310 (talk) 13:52, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Clearly someone hasn't read the above comment, so what you said was irrelevant as it's already answered above. I should remind that  SPI is a place to discuss SPI investigations, not content disputes , since you're going off-topic deliberately to shift attention away from your abuse of accounts and IPs. Nguyễn Quốc Việt (talk) 14:14, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

 SPI is a place to discuss SPI investigations, not content disputes ,what about your previous comment? did you going off-topic.Jspeed1310 (talk) 14:25, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Actually your puppet Alphama started talking about content, then i intended to make 1 answer to it. Nice try. Nguyễn Quốc Việt (talk) 14:33, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

first, don't delete my comment, you did it twice. second, Alphama is pro member in vi-wiki, until admin finish this investigation, pls don't say something like "your pupet"...etc...finally, first :D, you said this article is about the term "dân bắc kỳ" and how it's used in southern. then you change to "provide a summary of contemporary northern Vietnamese history, geography, and account for migrations of northern Vietnamese to other parts of the country". so what it's truly about, the people or the term. i think it's name should be changed to northern vietnamese people because the content is changed. but as i said "i don't see much of difference between northern, central, southern vietnamese to having multiple articles.".Jspeed1310 (talk) 14:49, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
 * When the heck did i delete your comments? For all i know your edits conflicted with mines and my comments were lost several times and i had to redo it. I'll not respond to any more circular statements. Again,  SPI is a place to discuss SPI investigations, not content disputes . Nguyễn Quốc Việt (talk) 16:15, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Actually all about those 4 things I listed above. Nguyễn Quốc Việt (talk) 16:28, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

cãi nhau với thằng này mệt người, lần cuối đây lần 1, lần 2.Jspeed1310 (talk) 16:31, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, and you made me retype those long paragraph again because you edit while i editted. thay chua thang kia? Nguyễn Quốc Việt (talk) 16:36, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Accounts blocked and tagged, master for 1 week. IPs stale. Closing. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:36, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

08 December 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility


 * Jspeed1310 and his puppet account Alphama and his 2 Vietnamese IPs both attempted to eliminate the Người Bắc Kỳ article 5 times within a 8-hour period, on Dec.7.2013. First, Jspeed tried to blank the article and replace with a redirect to the Vietnamese people article at UTC 5:54. When I reverted it because his edit reason was invalid, Jspeed redid his article blanking at UTC 8:34. Then, he logged out and used IP 113.172.224.235 (from Ho Chi Minh city, Vietnam) to speedy delete the article at 10:25. After, Jspeed used Hanoi IP 113.22.28.205 to make another speedy delete at 11:30. He used his puppet account Alphama to issue yet another speedy delete at 13:12. Deletion requests were denied by Jni, concluding that "I declined to speedily delete this. This is because there is non-trivial editing history and the debate seems to be about the content of the article, or whether or not it should be a redirect pointing somewhere, and discussion already involves arguments that go way beyond what is typical for CSDs. The request also did not match any of the CSD criterias. Further blanking of this article/redirect should be considered as vandalism and reverted" at 9:41, Dec.7.
 * Jspeed also requested speedy deletion of the Dân Bắc Kỳ article within this 8-hour period (article was recently deleted by user Amatulic, 5 hours before this SPI was filed).
 * Jspeed has a long-running vendetta against the and Dân Bắc Kỳ and Người Bắc Kỳ articles, as he tried to blank the Dan Bac Ky article numerous times (~7 times) and replace with redirect to Vietnamese people article, each time with no edit summary whatsoever, starting from January 2013 till yesterday. When he found Nguoi Bac Ky, he started blanking and redirecting that article as well. (I can no longer retrieve the Dân Bắc Kỳ's edit history because it's deleted)
 * It is obvious that Alphama and the 2 IPs are from Jspeed, as they all engage in the same activity (speedy-deleting the 2 articles) at the same time, exactly matching the timing of Jspeed's article blanking campaign, all with the intent of eliminating those 2 articles. Vantungk35 article-blanked and vandalized Dan Bac Ky article late last month, blanking and vandalized by inserting this following text " dân nam kỳ chỉ biết phá hoại, gái nam kỳ chỉ biết làm đĩ nuôi chồng " (translated: Southern Vietnamese people only know how to vandalize all the time, southern Vietnamese women only know to be whores and care for their husbands")(I posted that quote on user Vsmith's talk page yesterday, when I still had access to the Dan Bac Ky article diff history, and reference to the vandalism can be found here).
 * The IPs and 3 useraccounts all come from the same country, same person. Jspeed is a resident of Hanoi, (as declared on his Vietnamese wiki user page "Thành viên này sống tại thủ đô Hà Nội" = "This user lives in the capital Hanoi"). IPs are from Vietnam. The accounts Alphama and Jspeed both edit on many Vietnam-related articles. The 3 useraccounts and 2 IPs lack edit summaries on the majority of their edits due to their low proficiency in using the English language, as admitted by Jspeed when he says "sorry, my english is bad" on here at the last sentence.
 * I already confronted Jspeed about his sockpuppetry here, and he has never denied or contested this.
 * More background info can be found here if needed. If Checkuser is needed to find more relationships between the 3 useraccounts and 2 IPs, please feel free to do so. However i must warn, the IPs used by all 5 are likely proxies - no one can be in Saigon in 1 hour then magically be in Hanoi the next hour.
 * EDIT: As well, watch if Jspeed and Alphama change/manipulate their IPs, they're probably doing it based on their conversations on Viwiki.

Thank you in advance for your time and consideration. Nguyễn Quốc Việt (talk) 07:37, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.'' LOL, i'm waiting :D.Jspeed1310 (talk) 08:02, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
 * See, proof of trolling too. Nguyễn Quốc Việt (talk) 08:35, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

take it easy, boy.Jspeed1310 (talk) 08:47, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
 * you mean this conversations:"bác sửa cái gì để tay này bây giờ nghĩ tôi với bác là 1 thế :D" (what did you edit to make that guy thinks me and you are 1 :D), i thought you understand vietnamese.Jspeed1310 (talk) 08:46, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
 * you think i don't know what you're up to? Nguyễn Quốc Việt (talk) 08:49, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

watch if Jspeed and Alphama change/manipulate their IPs, they're probably doing it based on their conversations on Viwiki. what did you mean in this sentence, i thought we are 1.Jspeed1310 (talk) 08:56, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, you change IPs on one or both accounts to make you look like as if you're 2 different people. Don't think you can play games to fool other Vietnamese. Nguyễn Quốc Việt (talk) 08:59, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

=v= :).Jspeed1310 (talk) 09:01, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi there, admin can check freely my account. I am a reputed member in Vietnamese Wikipedia project with more than +30.000 edits and +100.000 edits by using bot (AlphamaBot). Furthermore, currently I do not live in Vietnam. I did revert the redirects of two articles (Dan Bac Ky and Dân Bắc Kỳ) because they are not correct simply. The two redirects just mention to the North of Vietnam not all Vietnamese people. You can check the content of that article. User Nguyễn Quốc Việt seemly accused me and slowed down the quality of Wikipedia. I myself doubted his contributions were not neutral. Thank you! Alphama (talk) 10:10, 8 December 2013 (UTC)


 * The point of the article is to provide a summary of contemporary northern Vietnamese history, geography, terminology (3 of them) and account for migrations of northern Vietnamese to other parts of the country, it is not political piece. The article was created in a no more different manner as articles like North China, or Northern Germany or Southern Egypt, and is in line with corresponding Vietnamese article, Bắc Kỳ. As for the migrations and "New Economic Zones", they are true and actual historical events, and are supported by well-accepted sources that are used elsewhere on Vietnam history articles on English wiki, and it is a very short English version of the Viet version article "Xây dựng các vùng kinh tế mới". As for the, rather unfortunate, use by some southern Vietnamese of using the term "Bac Ky" derogatorially, yes it's unfortunate, but it is a reality and the article simply states that, just as how Kraut or Jap or Chink are used by some Western lowlifes to refer to German, Japanese and Chinese people in a derogatory manner. And, the article never says or implies that northern Vietnamese are a "different ethnicity", which is absolutely wrong. To blame that the article implies that, following that kind of logic, the many other regional articles in wiki, like the 3 exampled above, might as well be accused of making northern Germans, or northern Han Chinese, or southern Egyptians as "separate ethnicities". Nguyễn Quốc Việt (talk) 13:27, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
 * You should continue this discussion in Vietnamese people article. Alphama (talk) 15:05, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

did you read my comment, this article, you may keep, but you can't use it when you say about northern vietnamese ((1, 2, 3)). itself is just a term used by southern vietnamese like jap, Kraut or Chink used by western. it can't replace for Japanese people, Chinese people or northern vietnamese people.btw, i don't see much of difference between northern, central, southern vietnamese to having multiple articles.Jspeed1310 (talk) 13:52, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Clearly someone hasn't read the above comment, so what you said was irrelevant as it's already answered above. I should remind that  SPI is a place to discuss SPI investigations, not content disputes , since you're going off-topic deliberately to shift attention away from your abuse of accounts and IPs. Nguyễn Quốc Việt (talk) 14:14, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

 SPI is a place to discuss SPI investigations, not content disputes ,what about your previous comment? did you going off-topic.Jspeed1310 (talk) 14:25, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Actually your puppet Alphama started talking about content, then i intended to make 1 answer to it. Nice try. Nguyễn Quốc Việt (talk) 14:33, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

first, don't delete my comment, you did it twice. second, Alphama is pro member in vi-wiki, until admin finish this investigation, pls don't say something like "your pupet"...etc...finally, first :D, you said this article is about the term "dân bắc kỳ" and how it's used in southern. then you change to "provide a summary of contemporary northern Vietnamese history, geography, and account for migrations of northern Vietnamese to other parts of the country". so what it's truly about, the people or the term. i think it's name should be changed to northern vietnamese people because the content is changed. but as i said "i don't see much of difference between northern, central, southern vietnamese to having multiple articles.".Jspeed1310 (talk) 14:49, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
 * When the heck did i delete your comments? For all i know your edits conflicted with mines and my comments were lost several times and i had to redo it. I'll not respond to any more circular statements. Again,  SPI is a place to discuss SPI investigations, not content disputes . Nguyễn Quốc Việt (talk) 16:15, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Actually all about those 4 things I listed above. Nguyễn Quốc Việt (talk) 16:28, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

cãi nhau với thằng này mệt người, lần cuối đây lần 1, lần 2.Jspeed1310 (talk) 16:31, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, and you made me retype those long paragraph again because you edit while i editted. thay chua thang kia? Nguyễn Quốc Việt (talk) 16:36, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Accounts blocked and tagged, master for 1 week. IPs stale. Closing. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:36, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
 * In light of an unblock request, I decided to run a check through all alleged accounts.
 * appears to be ❌ confirming Reaper Eternal's findings.
 * looks from the technical data, though by a little stretch.

As such I will be overturning Alphama's block, and I invite other CUs to verify my findings. - Mailer Diablo 09:59, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Closing case, I don't think there's anything left here for us to do. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:25, 6 January 2014 (UTC)