Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Juandeconu/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

[] has editors reverting the same edits from the sockpuppets over and over and over again because they contain unreliable sources. All of these edits seem to be directed at fraud investigations on Verbeke. Furthermore, all of the suspected IP addresses except the 5th have only edited one page: Siegfried Verbeke, and the 5th only edited Verbeke's article and one about Valencia. Revisions:
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Siegfried_Verbeke&oldid=1030033920 is the most recent revert as of writing, revised by User:Juandeconu. This revision in particular also contains a link to a pamphlet explaining Wikipedia and how it censors people
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Siegfried_Verbeke&oldid=1029940099 is by the first IP listed. Contains a sentence regarding a soon-to-be-released book. This theme seems to be continued in older edits by the other IPs.
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Siegfried_Verbeke&oldid=1027994584 is the next revision in order. This is by the second IP listed and contains similar information to the previously-mentioned revisions.
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Siegfried_Verbeke&oldid=1027570255 is by the third IP. This seems to add much of the exact same content and intentions as the second IP with a few formatting changes.
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Siegfried_Verbeke&oldid=1026513092 is by the fourth IP. Adds less information but has the same general theme.
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Siegfried_Verbeke&oldid=1026285640 is by the fifth IP. This is the earliest edit that adds dissident information and adds more information than some of the later edits. Note that the edit summary for the fourth and fifth revisions listed here are by verbatim the same. InvadingInvader (talk) 15:10, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
I've indeffed the named account for BLP violations. I've combined 3 IPs into one range just for convenience. I'm not convinced that the IPs are the named account, but, regardless, if they act up again (they haven't edited since yesterday), the range can be blocked or the article protected.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:48, 23 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Given this, pretty darn sure the /25 is them. Gave that range a couple weeks off. Other IPs haven't edited lately, not blocking them. No tags. Closing. GeneralNotability (talk) 20:16, 23 June 2021 (UTC)