Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Julia Ekberg/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
Both brand new accounts, whos sole and identical edits have been to revert the removal of a reference to the Eurabia book from Racism in the Arab world. These changes have also been made by a set of Korean IPs 14.43.178.87 and 14.47.44.157 which geolocate closely to each other, who I presume are the same master. Hemiauchenia (talk) 09:20, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Callawaypromus has continued to edit war in the reference on the 23rd, after the semi-protection was lifted. Hemiauchenia (talk) 02:20, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Courtesy links to diffs:
 * First revert by JE
 * Subsequent two reverts by Cp. 0x Deadbeef 12:52, 25 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Although CU cannot be used to connect a user to an IP address, these two reverts also seem sus, with the second IP proxy-blocked. This is related to
 * who has had content disputes on the same article in the past (diff), who also uses "rv" a lot. 0x Deadbeef 13:03, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
 * who has had content disputes on the same article in the past (diff), who also uses "rv" a lot. 0x Deadbeef 13:03, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - please compare Julia Ekberg and Callawaypromus and check for others, as these accounts do not behave like new users. I am not endorsing a check on Qahramani44 - they are a fairly tenured account, the dispute they were previously involved in did not involve the same content, and it does not look to me like they share the same POV as the accounts in the filing. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 14:56, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
 * - -- RoySmith (talk) 15:04, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Callawaypromus and Julia Ekberg are to each other, but there's extensive proxy use, so . -- RoySmith (talk) 15:14, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I blocked the unblocked proxy mentioned in the filing. I've also both accounts for violating WP:SOCK (may be MEAT, may be outright socking, but the abuse of proxies indicates that a) this is deliberate evasion of scrutiny and b) quite possibly a repeat customer) in order to push a political POV. Closing.  --Blablubbs (talk) 16:00, 25 June 2022 (UTC)