Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Juliesong/Archive

23 April 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

This user is not only just not signing in to hide behind an IP address to be disruptive but the user also makes personal attacks during AfD discussions.

Edit that was made by 99.122.81.101 but signed by Juliesong

Edit by 99.122.81.101 stating that Lady Lotus has ""an agenda" as an over jealous EP fan. She is known as a "trouble maker" with Wikipedia and Facebook." Which is untrue.

User just seems to be a disruptive fan with no attempt at beneficial edits. LADY LOTUS • TALK 19:32, 23 April 2014 (UTC)


 * I'm adding User:Elwood48 to this SPI also as they just appeared to have a say so in the Articles for deletion/Ginger Alden discussion and has only made 7 edits, all of which were about Ginger Alden or about her on the Personal relationships of Elvis Presley page. LADY LOTUS • TALK 13:42, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''


 * Indeed very disruptive in the AfD for Ginger Alden. User should also be reported at WP:ANI. Julie also seems to be a single-purpose account. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 14:33, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * is a sock of  though, as always, WP:MEAT cannot be disproved. If the edits at the AfD are disruptive enough, that trumps any CU findings. --Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots  16:50, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Juliesong has not "hid" behind an IP address; hiding does not include signing your account name after an IP address edits. It has all the appearance of a new account unfamiliar with Wikipedia, editing while logged out (either because they forgot to log in or otherwise were confused). While Elwood48 and Juliesong clearly share an interest, they don't seem to be the only ones, I note other SPAs on this article over its history (including Jonathanmarc4, Vespas51, and various IPs). Juliesong could be one of the older SPAs creating a new account (which isn't disallowed since all of the old SPA accounts are long abandoned), or could be recruited to the AfD (it's impossible to know) but given that there is no apparent technical connection I'm confident in concluding that Juliesong and Elwood48 only share an interest, nothing more. Juliesong is guilty of disruption, but nothing since the most recent warning so there doesn't seem to be need for administrative action at this point. I'm marking the case for closure. --  At am a  頭 18:43, 29 April 2014 (UTC)