Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JungerMan Chips Ahoy!/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Infinity Knight came out of nowhere, having not edited for six months, to propose deletion at an article here. Although not stated, the nature of the rationale was clearly related to a discussion at Talk:Naharayim with Jungerman which had been going on for some time. The only other editor in that discussion who would share the motive is a long-tenured editor. Both Infinity Knight and Jungerman have edit histories stereotypical of sockpuppets built to evade the 500/30 ARBPIA ban - both immediately plowed into the ARBPIA area after crossing the 500 edits mark. Onceinawhile (talk) 21:39, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

But what is the point?He could propose the deletion himself --Shrike (talk) 22:08, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Proposing deletion is usually counted as a "vote". Later supportive commentary under a different name makes it seem like two people.
 * Note that Jungerman was clearly watching the AfD for a long time before they decided to comment, since they added your signature half a day before commenting. Onceinawhile (talk) 22:20, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
 * ,But he didn't !vote at all so I still don't see any point using a sock. Shrike (talk) 22:30, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
 * He commented in support. Onceinawhile (talk) 22:41, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ❌. Closing. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:19, 2 May 2020 (UTC)