Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Justshepu/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

I have doubts about FNH004 due to slightly different edit style. However something still doesn't look right.
 * Mohammad Atikuzzaman created by BdH1H2 on 28 October 2021 after more or less the same article draft Draft:Mohamed Atikuzzaman (by FNH004) repeatedly declined in AfC.
 * Mohammad Ridoy and Mohammad Atikuzzaman created by BdH1H2 and brought to PROD by me, only to be immediately defended and dePRODed by FNH004 and Justshepu.
 * Musafire Syed Bachchu repeatedly recreated by Justshepu, before resurfacing in BdH1H2 sandbox
 * Justshepu briefly identified himself as Md Younus Shepon. BdH1H2 createad a draft of Md Younus Shepon (since deleted).
 * Jahid Nirob started by Justshepu, then significantly expanded by BdH1H2. BlameRuiner (talk) 22:36, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - the filing presents a good case that these accounts (especially Justshepu and BdH1H2) may be related, and I have suspicions that there are other socks floating around. For example, see BDH1H2's creation of Ziaul Haque Polash and the extensive deletion log at Ziaul Hoque Polash. Or these filter hits from a SPA account (now stale) removing an AfD tag from a creation by Justshepu. Or the fact that Justshepu's account was created on the Bengali Wikisource, yet has no edits there - that's a rather strange place for a "new user" to start out. Please compare these accounts and check for sleepers. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 17:19, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
 * BdH1H2 ✅ to Justshepu. Also found:
 * all of which are ✅ . FNH004 is  -- RoySmith (talk) 03:09, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
 * all of which are ✅ . FNH004 is  -- RoySmith (talk) 03:09, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
 * all of which are ✅ . FNH004 is  -- RoySmith (talk) 03:09, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
 * all of which are ✅ . FNH004 is  -- RoySmith (talk) 03:09, 21 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks. In the absence of a conclusive CU result I don't think there's enough evidence to block FNH004 - while there are some questionable overlaps, there are also noticeable differences in editing style (e.g. use of source editor, lack of edit summaries). I can't rule out some sort of coordination with the other accounts, but I also can't rule out that they're just a Bangladeshi football fan who isn't up to speed with notability guidelines. I do not think there is sufficient behavioural evidence to block the three accounts found by CU, either; two of them have no edits, and the edits of don't show any obvious relation to the blocked accounts. Closing.  Spicy (talk) 15:03, 21 November 2021 (UTC)