Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Justtheeditor1/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
Justtheeditor1 was blocked for socking, but I don't see an SPI report. Relevant info in this Teahouse post:

I received a suspicious talk page comment from Rockywriter88:. I find their writing style extremely similar to Justtheeditor1 in this example:.

Suspected sockpuppeteer said in the Teahouse post that there are multiple people working together. From the writing style across accounts, I suspect at least some of these "multiple people" are just socks. asilvering (talk) 06:04, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Technically, these accounts are ❌. There's nothing more to say here from a sockpuppetry perspective - if they are being disruptive, consider reporting at WP:COIN. Closing without action.  Girth Summit  (blether)  11:12, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Rather than archive, I'm going to ping @Ponyo since she blocked and might be able to see something. Courcelles (talk) 22:13, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
 * It was a vanilla sock block based on suspected COI coordination, hence why there was no SPI. Justtheeditor appears to essentially admit to such coordination on their talk page, so it would be unsurprising to see other accounts pop up focused on the same specific handful of articles.-- Ponyo bons mots 22:33, 28 July 2023 (UTC)