Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jwleu/Archive

Evidence submitted by Stonemason89
These three accounts are all single-purpose accounts whose only edits are to Stephen Broden and closely related articles, and which all have nonsensical, barely pronouncable usernames. Also, both Jwleu and Michejm have a tendency to forget to sign their posts using four tildes (both have been warned about this on their respective talk pages). This seems a little suspicious. I do think Broden satisfies the notability criterion, but only because his comments about "violence" have become the national news in the past 2 days or so. The edits from these accounts go way back further than that, back when Broden wasn't really notable at all. Jwleu is the creator of the article, and these three accounts have made the vast majority of the edits to Stephen Broden since it was created. I wonder if any of these accounts are related to Broden's or his opponent's campaign. A checkuser would help determine if this is the case. Stonemason89 (talk) 16:55, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
. Amalthea  19:42, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
 * No, checkuser won't and almost certainly can't determine whether the accounts are related to anyone's campaign.
 * 1) They haven't edited for close to a month. I don't see grounds for checking, or really any kind of action at this point.