Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jwratner1/Archive

22 January 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Jwratner1 was blocked for copyvio on the 4th of January. Epiphanize101 arrived this morning and started to edit Primary motor cortex, Postcentral gyrus,  Soil structure and  Autonomous car. Of these 4 articles, 3 are completely unrelated. Jwratner1 has also edited those articles. Asking for CU check for sleepers in case there are other socks currently editing other articles. Dougweller (talk) 15:54, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''


 * I grabbed one randomly to check...at soil structure, the content Epiphanize101 added is the same as what I had removed from Jwratner1, and I confirmed that it was copyvio. DMacks (talk) 17:41, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
I've blocked and tagged (as suspected) the account as a sockpuppet and for introducing copyright violations. The crossover between the accounts should be enough to warrant a CheckUser but I'm not sure if it'll useful for anything other than confirming that there is a connection, so I've set the status to CUrequest rather than endorsing so that others can take a look. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:44, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
 * is ✅, but their behavior should be examined before any determination is made. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 14:24, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
 * is ✅, but their behavior should be examined before any determination is made. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 14:24, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
 * is ✅, but their behavior should be examined before any determination is made. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 14:24, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
 * is ✅, but their behavior should be examined before any determination is made. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 14:24, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
 * is ✅, but their behavior should be examined before any determination is made. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 14:24, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
 * is ✅, but their behavior should be examined before any determination is made. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 14:24, 28 January 2014 (UTC)


 * The formatting of LollyBear12's first file upload & edit make it pretty clear that LollyBear12 is not a new account. DoRD's CheckUser finding, the focus on File:Upwelling animated.gif in the following edits by Jwratner1 & LollyBear12, and the types of files both LollyBear12 and Jwratner1 uploaded, make it pretty clear that LollyBear12 is a sockpuppet of Jwratner1.
 * All accounts blocked and tagged. Closing. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:46, 29 January 2014 (UTC)