Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jyongchul/Archive

03 January 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Except for the master, the only action of each of these socks has been to add links to two websites (for example, see this diff for RobberAnarchy). I've requested the two sites be added to the spam blacklist; at the same time, it won't hurt to run an SPI. I've already blocked all of the accounts above, but given the rate of creation it would not shock me if there are many more. Thus, a CU to find any others would be appreciated. If not approved, at least this will be a permanent repository of the socks found so far. Qwyrxian (talk) 15:10, 3 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Just before this is archived, note that I've blocked and tagged two more today: User:Jihadiaen and User:Jellypo. Qwyrxian (talk) 01:25, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
 * And three more: User:DeiceNice and User:Holensto and User:PinRise. I'm going to ask the clerk to reopen to see if there's anything more a CU can do. Qwyrxian (talk) 01:50, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
This is messy. Messier still when you have a newbie checkuser.
 * - T. Canens (talk) 15:13, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * and Jyongchul are ✅.
 * is related to WaKurisu and Hodoreels. I would definitely keep an eye on that account.
 * The IPs are all over the place, these are pretty much all webhosts, but the UA is identical, and taking into account the behavior I'd call the bunch ✅. T. Canens (talk) 15:37, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I blocked the bunch of hosting ranges for now. Clerks: please keep this one open for a while. T. Canens (talk) 16:09, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Timotheus Canens asked me to look at the CU results as they are somewhat complicated due to the abuse of webhosts and a VPN service. With the behavior taken into account, I'm calling all the named users, including the two directly above, ✅ matches. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 16:11, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * All of them tagged. ( X!  ·  talk )  · @879  · 20:05, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to check for more socks, which I'm ing for CU. ( X! ·  talk )  · @134  · 02:12, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
 * More webhosts, except that DeiceNice is using the same IP as that used by Jyongchul. ✅, . T. Canens (talk) 02:29, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Yep, nothing really to do to prevent these. Report them if they continue. ( X! ·  talk )  · @286  · 05:52, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The offending URL's have been added to the blacklist--Hu12 (talk) 17:39, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

06 January 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Admitted socks. Already blocked, but adding to report for possible IP block and to add to record. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:13, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Another webhost rangeblocked. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 23:41, 6 January 2013 (UTC)