Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/K100unique/Archive

20 March 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

The original user was blocked 3 days ago by Coffee for "Refusal to respond to inquiries about their editing; potential competency issues as well". The account Pradipunique is essentially recreating the same articles (about an ex-mayor and his family) with similar content (which the original account had created but were speedied). However, they claim they are not related. The behavioral seems very similar to me though. I would request Checkuser verification since I would not want the user to be blocked without a reason. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 10:03, 20 March 2016 (UTC) Lemongirl942 (talk) 10:03, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * My main evidence is this draft Draft:Shivraj_Kamble created by the original user and the article Shiv_Kamble created by the new user. The date of birth and other details are similar in both. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 10:07, 20 March 2016 (UTC)


 * I have added user:Shivarajlive2016. There is significant similarity in topic editting to user:Shivshirsatlive.  On Shivaraj kamble:, .  At MagicTouch (pencil sketch): , .  Shivarajlive2016 has also created the Vivek Kamble article which is apparently a relative of Shivaraj kamble. -- Whpq (talk) 14:26, 21 March 2016 (UTC)


 * I have added user:K100unique. Overlap in topic editting on Shivaraj kamble, and creating an article on an article on a pencil sketch  which is similar to MagicTouch (pencil sketch) as they are both apparently works of  Shivaraj kamble. -- Whpq (talk) 14:37, 21 March 2016 (UTC)


 * NOTE to admin/checkuser - I added two accounts to the list after the clerk endorsed the checkuser. The two additional accounts have not been reviewed by an admin/clerk. -- Whpq (talk) 14:46, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Agh, I was just in the process of reporting this myself! Ah, well, carry on -- this is really suspicious behavior to me. The master should be switched to be K100unique, as they are the oldest. GABHello! 16:19, 21 March 2016 (UTC)


 * I think that a check is just a formality here. Definite duck. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rasimmons (talk • contribs) 17:03, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Please, compare those two accounts.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  10:37, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
 * and are ✅ from each other and ✅ to .  is also ✅ as .-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots  18:33, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:50, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

09 April 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Apparently we missed one of the socks in the drawer. The name of the accounts S100unique and K100unique have obvious similiarities. The sock created a Shivaraj kamble draft. This is the same topic matter that was worked on in both draft an article space under various titles. See Draft:Shivraj_Kamble, Shiv_Kamble, Shivaraj kamble. Whpq (talk) 13:17, 9 April 2016 (UTC) Created Sidhant Shirsat on another family member. Already blocked--just noting for the record. -- Finngall  talk  14:27, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . Both blocked and tagged. CLosing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  21:05, 26 April 2016 (UTC)