Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/KBlott/Archive

Evidence submitted by NativeForeigner
Could somebody please see if there is a range connection/proxies, and relate these accounts? Also, sleeper check in order. It would appear the editor knows how to IP hop and is abusing it, so if there is a range it would be great to lock it down. Alternate was blocked based on obvious spamming on arbcom talk pages over a dispute of badbabysitter (another sock) NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs 00:41, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
✅ plus



–MuZemike 04:45, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Marking for close. TN X Man  11:45, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

27 June 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

All three editors made the same edits to HIV: First edit, second edit with accusation of vandalism, and third edit with accusation of vandalism. All three editors have the same kind of user page: Thematrixmantor, Aparagraph, and MuzeMarc. All three editors most recent edits are to HIV and nothing for the past few months on any other article. In fact, all seem to have edits today after not editing for awhile. Orange Marlin Talk• Contributions 05:04, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
All three users are ✅ as. –MuZemike 05:38, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

16 February 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Naming very similar to older socks (User:2nd Alternate user name,User:Alternate user name). Refers to user mZm on his userpage, which is probably User:Muzemike who blocked the sockmaster and several socks. Exclusively interested in HIV related stuff User:Alternative account no2012/HIV prevention Yoenit (talk) 19:32, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Check for sleepers or other related accounts. The sock maintained he's an alt account, but it's still a clear violation of the sock policy due to who he is related to. NativeForeigner Talk 06:39, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
 * No sleepers, but for what it is worth it is ✅. Tiptoety  talk 06:53, 17 February 2012 (UTC)