Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ka12345678/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

See below. — Berean Hunter   (talk)  13:18, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

This is probably an LTA. But which one? Alexlatham96 (talk) 06:23, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * He reminds me of Cali11298 for a number of reasons, including having stalked me to Talk:Child. I'm not pinging the account because Cali has logged into his old account before to see where he's been mentioned. The reasons he reminds of Cali are the following: Cali had a habit of issuing copied and pasted warnings to editors, and he would often be so enthusiastic about it that he would be overly harsh or wrong with his warnings. EGL1234 did that, and was queried on his talk page about one of his warnings. Cali would be involved with teahouse or noticeboards. EGL1234 was involved with the teahouse. Cali would edit comic book articles; he is a fan of Beast Boy and even had the username BeastBoy3395. Well, with this edit, EGL1234 recently edited the Beast Boy article. As noted at Sockpuppet investigations/Cali11298/Archive, Cali likes to state "goodbye" in different ways, with a comma between the goodbye variation and his signature. He would state, "Hasta la vista." He would state, "Regards." He would state, "Anyways, see you." He would state, "Adios." He would state "Cheers." Well, with this edit, EGL1234 stated, "Cheers." As seen here, Cali was focused on becoming an administrator. He stated, "That's it, I'm done with this fucking horseshit. I never should've commented at that RfA, I only found it because I'm a Recent changes Patroller, and decided to edit it to boost my edit count in the Wikipedia namespace, as I want to be an administrator someday (I didn't find that RfA by stalking you, just to let you know). I plan on making a separate account, doing legitimate edits, and then applying for adminship in a year-and-a-half or so." Well, with this edit, EGL1234 went on about wanting to become an administrator.
 * I state "stalked" in this case because a new account showing up at the Child talk page to comment about the gallery soon after I did when that talk page is hardly ever active is not a coincidence. Coincidences like that don't happen with regard to me. In cases like this, the account is always one of my stalkers. Always.
 * The difference between Cali and EGL1234 is that EGL1234 seems a bit more immature than Cali. He also seems a bit more inexperienced when it comes to editing, although this could be an act. And, on EGL1234s talk page, he used British spelling for "apologize." Used an s instead of a z. And taking into account whatever region EGL1234 is editing from, he probably isn't Cali (although people can move). Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 17:24, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅

He's talking to his other accounts and has done enough logged out editing/trolling that this is likely some other master older than these. He also did this vandalism at the Teahouse and then asked about it. . — Berean Hunter   (talk)  13:24, 27 April 2020 (UTC)