Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kalajan/Archive

Report date January 30 2009, 19:52 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

Kalajan has engaged in general disruption and has been blocked a couple of times. I have gone out on a limb and assumed good faith until recently when I had to block him again. Several suspicious edits occured right before kalajan was blocked including the creation of Mecha13's account. A checkuser alluded that these users are in fact the same user when they denied the unblock request I would however like to have this clarified. Initial edits such as this caused me to block kalajan for sock puppet abuse however this action came under scrutiny based on my insufficient evidence and that the link to that page in question had bee posted on the wikiproject wrestling talk page. Simple confirmation of this would be appreciated. Thanks Chris  lk02  Chris Kreider 19:52, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Nevermind, he just confessed. Chris  lk02  Chris Kreider 20:09, 30 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments by other users


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

per user confession. Mayalld (talk) 14:17, 2 February 2009 (UTC) Mayalld (talk) 14:17, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Conclusions

Report date February 12 2009, 01:04 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

Kalajan was recently indefinitely blocked, and this account, although created earlier, only started editing heavily recently after the Kalajan block. Editing patterns very similar to Kalajan's, including joining up with WP:PW right away, and chatting with some of the users Kalajan talked to very often.  iMatthew //  talk  //  01:04, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by  iMatthew //  talk  //

I didn't "join up" with WP:PW, I only found them because I was instructed to go there for discussions concerning the One Night Stand pay per view's name change. Also, I haven't "chatted" with anyone. Wwehurricane1 (talk) 02:31, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users

Requested by  iMatthew //  talk  //  01:04, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * CheckUser requests


 * Endorsed by me. --Deskana (talk) 02:50, 12 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

❌ --Deskana (talk) 02:50, 12 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Conclusions

Unrelated. Case closed. --Deskana (talk) 02:50, 12 February 2009 (UTC)