Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kambojharsangeet/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Amongst other things. Yet more undeclared promotion editing of Michael J. Freeman. Forgetting which account was being used Kambojharsangeet blanked User:Skaur.wiki/sandbox then quickly revert himself. Given the number of promotional accounts and socks who have used Wikipedia to try to promote the subject a checkuser will help separate the shills from the socks. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:22, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Blak Kalamawi. Developed in sandbox of Skaur.wiki by Skaur.wiki. Created in mainspace by Kambojharsangeet . duffbeerforme (talk) 11:34, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Is it possible to do a cross-project checkwiki? These accounts have a demonstrated history of adding large quantities of Commons images to Wikipedia articles, limited exclusively to those uploaded by c:User:Wuestenigel. Ibadibam (talk) 18:54, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Group 1 – the following accounts are ✅:
 * Group 2 – the following accounts are also technical matches but :
 * There are a significant number of technically matched accounts that are already blocked as spam-only. I'm not listing them.
 * I've blocked and tagged the accounts in Group 1.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:25, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Those accounts are either abandoned or seam completely unrelated. I'm closing this.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:05, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Group 2 – the following accounts are also technical matches but :
 * There are a significant number of technically matched accounts that are already blocked as spam-only. I'm not listing them.
 * I've blocked and tagged the accounts in Group 1.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:25, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Those accounts are either abandoned or seam completely unrelated. I'm closing this.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:05, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
 * There are a significant number of technically matched accounts that are already blocked as spam-only. I'm not listing them.
 * I've blocked and tagged the accounts in Group 1.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:25, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Those accounts are either abandoned or seam completely unrelated. I'm closing this.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:05, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
 * There are a significant number of technically matched accounts that are already blocked as spam-only. I'm not listing them.
 * I've blocked and tagged the accounts in Group 1.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:25, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Those accounts are either abandoned or seam completely unrelated. I'm closing this.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:05, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
 * There are a significant number of technically matched accounts that are already blocked as spam-only. I'm not listing them.
 * I've blocked and tagged the accounts in Group 1.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:25, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Those accounts are either abandoned or seam completely unrelated. I'm closing this.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:05, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Those accounts are either abandoned or seam completely unrelated. I'm closing this.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:05, 18 October 2016 (UTC)