Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kamtal75/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
Kamtal75 has been editing the William Davis (cardiologist) article and talk-page repeatedly making tedious edits regarding some apostrophes. After this user was reverted by another user Roxy the dog, Kamtal75 created two attack accounts against them and was also using two (blocked) IP addresses all making the same edits to the William Davis article. Kamtal75's account was blocked. Since being blocked on Kamtal75 yesterday, a new account "Grammarkiller86" matching Kamtal75's writing style has appeared on the William Davis article talk-page which is obvious block-evasion making the same argument as Kamtal75.

Kamtal75 may indeed be correct about their edits adhering to MOS but they have gone about this in the wrong way by repeatedly edit-warring, attacking other users and making sock-puppets. I believe their latest account Grammarkiller86 should be blocked and their talk-page access should be removed on Kamtal75 because this user is not acting in a civil manner. This user has been known to use mobile IP addresses, I don't know if it is worth using a check-user but it is likely they would just reset their phone and get a new IP. Psychologist Guy (talk) 22:14, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Both Kamtal75 and Grammarkiller86 leave "reply" in their edit summaries,, , . Although this may be common behaviour for some users, it was put in Grammarkiller86's very first edit summary which matches what Kamtal75 does. I believe these are both the same user. On their talk-page, Kamtal75 has promoted a ridiculous conspiracy theory that their account was hacked and another user created the attack accounts. After an admin pointed out there was check-user evidence they shifted gears and said the other accounts were blocked by a "mistake". I believe this user is very deceptive. Psychologist Guy (talk) 22:59, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Huh? The "reply" edit summary is put in automatically when you click on the "reply" link, just as I did right here. It's proof of nothing. Behaviorally, yes, Grammarkiller does appear to be another Kamtal75 account, but certainly the use of "reply" is no indicator of that. --jpgordon&#x1d122;&#x1d106;&#x1D110;&#x1d107; 14:03, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Ok that is interesting, I have never seen a reply link on Wikipedia before, all I have is a publish changes button and show preview, maybe it is because I am on the older version. Psychologist Guy (talk) 15:41, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Quack quack. Blocked and tagged. Bishonen &#124; tålk 07:27, 1 August 2023 (UTC).