Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Karakeçi24/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.


 * User:Karakeçi24 sole editing history concerns Russo-Turkish War (1676–1681).Original context in World History
 * Babayigit55's edit.
 * Fire2345
 * Karanlık544Original Context in World History
 * Fire2456Orginal context in World History

Pretty simple sockpuppetry. Karakeçi24 has created socks to change the result of the Russo-Turkish War (1676–1681). Using these socks to edit war against Nicoljaus and Jauerback. Karakeçi24 has tried personal attack and his sock states the same thing, even calling quoted information with book titles and page numbers as "propaganda". Kansas Bear (talk) 13:06, 4 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Karakeçi24 makes this comment, "Indecisive" is not compatible with Treaty of Bakhchisarai"-- 12:19, 26 January 2021 (UTC)


 * KanaKaNn(another editor that edit-warred on Russo-Turkish War (1676–1681) and was Indef), made this comment, "Even his evidence is not compatible with Treaty of this war" -- 01:45, 2 October 2020
 * This matches the evidence for the SPI concerning KanaKaNn. I believe that Karakeçi24 and KanaKaNn are one and the same. KanaKaNn has used sockpuppets before, and continues to make more of them. --Kansas Bear (talk) 01:28, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅. Bagging and tagging sock accounts. This SPI can be closed...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   02:05, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

 * ( original case name)




 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

The same agressive POV in article Russo-Turkish War (1676–1681). Каракорум (talk) 16:42, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

May be this intersections should be checked: Sockpuppet investigations/Umertan/Archive. Although the user recently demonstrates a pro-Turkish POV, he does not use sources in Turkish. And I see some commonalities in the ways in which ethical behavior is violated.--Nicoljaus (talk) 10:04, 4 February 2021 (UTC)


 * It is quite clear, especially from the recent post on my talk page, that user:CuciHan234 and user:Karakeçi24 are one and the same person. Same broken hardly legible English.


 * user:CuciHan234's post on my talk page
 * user:Karakeçi24's post on my talk page
 * Can we get an admin to address this nonsense? --Kansas Bear (talk) 21:43, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Another sock(BatuHan234) posted on my talk page, I have added their name to list. --Kansas Bear (talk) 17:17, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
I've blocked the 4 remaining unblocked usernames by WP:DUCK, but I have not tagged them or logged this anywhere, because I don't know what all I'm supposed to do. So there still might be a little work here for a clerk prior to closing. --Floquenbeam (talk) 19:35, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I tagged them all suspected. -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 13:43, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Filed this bullshit SPI naming three editors who were involved in putting down confirmed sock at the Russo-Turkish War (1676–1681) article. The new sock was created on January 26 and snoozed until now, so a CU for sleepers seems warranted. Favonian (talk) 20:00, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
 * comes to mind. Created January 27 and hasn't edited yet. Bears a certain nominal resemblance to the sock listed above as well as previously blocked and . Favonian (talk) 20:15, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
 * And the bestest part is, even as one of the admins named in the bullshit SPI, I didn't even have any actual involvement in the editwar; it just happened to pop up shortly after I tagged the article as uncategorized. Who knew being a process wonk could make me so interesting after all? Bearcat (talk) 22:11, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The accounts are already indefinitely blocked. Closing SPI...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   03:19, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

These are CU-confirmed with Avcı2345, GoldenHorde, CuciHan234, Cucihan. It's pretty pathetic if you ask me. Oh, User:GoldenHorde8 is also confirmed. Drmies (talk) 01:12, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Added another one to the pile. --Kansas Bear (talk) 02:44, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Ates289 is CU-confirmed with Avci244555. Drmies (talk) 03:00, 15 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Tagged the third as well. Closing. Blablubbs | talk 01:35, 18 March 2021 (UTC)