Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Katebondy/Archive

17 February 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets
 * (Already blocked)
 * (requesting for a long-term block)
 * (requesting for a long-term block)
 * (requesting for a long-term block)
 * (requesting for a long-term block)


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Katebondy is apparently the beginning of a long-term abuse of the pages Kate. Kate (given name) and Child development stages. All of this IPs (maybe exist others I didn't catch) do the same nonsense stuff 1 2 and 3. I am requesting the block of Kate, the main account for at least have a name of all of this vandalism. This girl won't stop as she believe she is doing nothing wrong.

With this SPI I intend a) that someone block all the IPs for a month, at least, since they apparently are static IPs, and b) protect the page (and probably the talkpages per the recent activity) from editing of this obnoxious girl. Tb hotch * ۩ ۞ 02:54, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - I'm endorsing this to check for sleepers; unfortunately the data for Katebondy is stale, so we can't run a CU to confirm against that account. Further, the IP range to cover those IPs - 70.79.0.0/16 - is pretty big and would cause a great deal of collateral damage, so I don't think we can block it. This one is a real mess. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 22:39, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Other ranges are too large to contemplate rangeblocking for now. -- Avi (talk) 03:37, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah, thought so. Both articles are protected for three months, so that should keep this down. Relist if more things happen. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 03:41, 18 February 2011 (UTC)