Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Katrina Villegas/Archive

19 December 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Passes WP:DUCK based on his/her editing habits, which mostly consist of inexplicably copying articles under another title, as well as coming up with hoaxes made by copy-pasting content. Blake Gripling (talk) 07:41, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Blocked and tagged as an obvious puppet. Closing. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:36, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

21 December 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Same bizarre copy and paste major hoax article modus operandi. Deleted contributions (etc) show this. I assume this is some sort of personal promotion. Do we need to check for sleepers now? Checkuser at your discretion. Fiddle  Faddle  12:53, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Obvious. Blocked and tagged. Not going to recommend CU.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:51, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

23 December 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and is indeed a duck - same bizarre cut-paste hoax modus along with poor grammar on Philippine-related articles. Blake Gripling (talk) 14:12, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Obvious, blocked, and tagged. Bbb23 (talk) 15:12, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

24 December 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Created fantastic looking article filled with links that make no mention of the subject. Or links that don't work. Ext links don't work either. One of a series of eponymous fake articles-- see Andrea Alteza & and Andrea Larteza &. File:Belle-mariano.jpg, uploaded by Andrea Alteza for use in Andrea Alteza is now used to portray Andrea Villegas Vevo. Dloh cierekim  21:36, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Comment Agree with merge. Had not met Katrina before, but definitely. Dloh cierekim  14:11, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
This will probably need to be merged with Sockpuppet investigations/Katrina Villegas. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:39, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: this section merged here from Sockpuppet investigations/Andrea Villegas Vevo. Mark Arsten (talk) 06:00, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Both suspected socks blocked indef, closing now. Mark Arsten (talk) 06:04, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

01 January 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Another variant on the same thing. "Filipina child star" with impossible CV and non working links. SeeVillegas Andrea and Andrea Villegas Discography and Category:Members of Christianas well as the user page. Dloh cierekim  04:33, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * That is, my good friends, a walking, quacking duck. So yes, it's Andrea, alright. Blake Gripling (talk) 08:10, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
blocked. I spent  a while today chasing  this user and their socks around and deleting  their re-creations as fast  as they  we're making  them. In view of the extent, I  recommend a CU for sleepers. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:20, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

I blocked her. There is more associated activity than I saw in the others Dloh cierekim  15:29, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Due to the extensive abuse, I looked at some of these accounts and found that they are using a number of busy dynamic IP ranges, so IP/range blocks are impractical. I didn't see any obvious sleepers, but frankly, it wouldn't be hard to miss them. (For future reference, to request CU in a case, add "curequest" to the SPI case status template.) ​—DoRD (talk)​ 16:57, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

02 January 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Has created another Andrea Villegas article about a Filipina child star with portions of other articles aded on and fake ref's. Cassey Da Silva. compare to user page. Dloh cierekim  12:27, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
. Blocked. Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  12:37, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

02 January 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Created yet another Andrea Villegas type article at Cassey Da Silva. For a list of prior iterations see User:Dlohcierekim/working/x  Dloh  cierekim  19:18, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Also blocked and tagged. Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  20:40, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

03 January 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Obvious sock of Katrina Villegas, based on his/her habit of repeated recreation of non-notable or hoaxed articles pertaining to Filipino child actresses. Blake Gripling (talk) 03:42, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Agreed; the user could be blocked per WP:DUCK without a check, even. Checking for sleepers… L Faraone  05:29, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
 * For what its worth, technically ✅, no sleepers. L Faraone  05:42, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

17 January 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Obvious given hoaxish content seen in other socks of this master; also name is a composite of other names used for this master's socks.  Dwpaul  Talk   04:06, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

User:Sabrina Vilegas created hoax articles. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:48, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Obvious sock is obvious, blocked and tagged, page creations deleted. for checkuser in case there are any sleepers lying around. Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  09:08, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * On second thoughts, - this user rarely if ever uses more than one account at a time, so I don't think a sleeper check is warranted. Any other clerk or CU is free to disagree. Yunshui  雲 &zwj; 水  09:11, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Guess I was wrong. Re-endorsing; looks like a sleeper check might not be such a bad idea... Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  11:59, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * AH, just when I was starting to miss her. Turn my back for on elittl minute. Dloh  cierekim  17:02, 17 January 2014 (UTC)


 * See case below for CU results. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 01:49, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

18 January 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

,, both hoaxish articles concerning a Filipina child actress in the same mode as the master.  Dwpaul  Talk   13:41, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Blocked. The Casey Andrea Villegas Da Silva mention in  clinches it  as a duck. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:12, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
 * There are a couple of other zero-edit sleeper possibilities I have omitted for now, but if they start to edit, they should be as obvious as usual. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 01:49, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
 * There are a couple of other zero-edit sleeper possibilities I have omitted for now, but if they start to edit, they should be as obvious as usual. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 01:49, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
 * There are a couple of other zero-edit sleeper possibilities I have omitted for now, but if they start to edit, they should be as obvious as usual. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 01:49, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
 * There are a couple of other zero-edit sleeper possibilities I have omitted for now, but if they start to edit, they should be as obvious as usual. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 01:49, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
 * There are a couple of other zero-edit sleeper possibilities I have omitted for now, but if they start to edit, they should be as obvious as usual. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 01:49, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
 * There are a couple of other zero-edit sleeper possibilities I have omitted for now, but if they start to edit, they should be as obvious as usual. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 01:49, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

21 January 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

WP:DUCK, CU for sleepers Jackmcbarn (talk) 19:45, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
— Berean Hunter   (talk)  23:02, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅ plus . ​—DoRD (talk)​ 20:29, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Indeffed socks with tags and closing.

24 January 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * Villegas User compare report Auto-generated every hour.


 * Editor interaction utility

Created article: "...Samantha Claire Clacenal Gonlonay also known as Samantha Clacenal is a filipina child actress..." same as the others. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 14:17, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Xyriel created the eponymous Xyriel Villegas; fits pattern.
 * MariMar forever- sole edit gave Xyriel a Barnstar. Dloh cierekim  14:48, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''


 * The name appears to be a composite of Xyriel Manabat, a real child actress, and the Villegas surname this sockpuppeteer likes to dabble with. Blake Gripling (talk) 22:44, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Already blocked by   and. Please check for tagging  of user pages and addition  to  cats. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:46, 25 January 2014 (UTC) — Berean Hunter   (talk)  14:58, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Tagging and closing.

26 January 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

This edit to Panday Kids. Now deleted, eponymous Xyriel Da Silva follows established pattern. User name is new variation old theme. Dloh cierekim  07:04, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Forever 26 created Panday Kids (series). Compare with Panday Kids. None of the source links work. Casey da Silva is one of the actors. Was subsequesntly edited by Xyriel. Dloh  cierekim  09:10, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * and have been blocked as result of Articles for deletion/Xyriel Villatez. Cheers,  Dloh  cierekim  19:14, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Indeffed. Quacks loud enough. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:13, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Not convinced on Forever 26, but I'll deal with the page. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:37, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Xyriel Da Silva is ✅ and I didn't see any sleepers. I am also unconvinced with respect to Forever 26, so they have not been checked, but I can say that they did not appear on the ranges that the other accounts have been using. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 18:32, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The confirmed sock has been tagged and blocked indef, no action taken towards Forever 26. Closing now. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:35, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

01 February 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Duck. User came to my attention when I was looking at 3 Ninjas Gilled and nominating it for speedy deletion for apparent hoax. "3 Ninjas Gilled (liit; Three Ninjas Superheroes), is a telefantasya film discovered in a base in Gubat Sagnaya, and directed by Andrew Masino. This is Led by the Three Child stars of telefantasya, Buboy Villar, Julian Trono and Xyriel Navarro." Article had one reference which resulted in a DNS error, and the only external link went to an IMDB page for writer Gloria Burton. Obviously the next step was to looking into who created the article. Main contributor was. Her user page was a phony article about herself. One of the references was to. Looking through her history, I noticed she blanked the user page of sockpuppet Cassey Da Silva. That action led me to look into sockpuppetry, and the rest is history. (Herstory?) Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:21, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Suspected sockpuppet blocked indef per behavior, closing now. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:06, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

04 February 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

another obvious sock: first edit was to create redirect at Xyriel Villegas Ruby   Murray  10:49, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Quack, quack. Blocked and tagged. Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  10:51, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

- : It's been a month, might be worth having another look for sleepers and possibility of an IP block. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:03, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
 * No sleepers at this time. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 13:36, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
 * All confirmed accounts tagged and blocked indef, closing now. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:53, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
 * No sleepers at this time. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 13:36, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
 * All confirmed accounts tagged and blocked indef, closing now. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:53, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
 * No sleepers at this time. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 13:36, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
 * All confirmed accounts tagged and blocked indef, closing now. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:53, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

06 February 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * Villegas 26 26 User compare report Auto-generated every hour.


 * Editor interaction utility

Duck because of username and created article: "...known as Andrea Villegas is a Filipina child actress..." same as the others. Already blocked by me. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:57, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''


 * This is getting old. Any ability to do a full IP block or does this prolific and juvenile puppetmaster work from variable IP? Fiddle   Faddle  14:13, 6 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Maybe I could talk to her next time. It's a long shot, but maybe worth a try. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 14:24, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * A rangeblock would result in too much collateral damage, so we're either going to have to continue playing Whac-a-Mole, or someone could request an addition to one of the existing edit filters. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 14:16, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
 * I've requested a filter to deal with the most common activities by this user, although if anyone feels they can improve on it, please do so. Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  14:35, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

09 February 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Creation of articles about non-existent Filipina child actresses: Creation of non-existent ABS-CBN TV shows (with non-existent IMDb pages)
 * Dazey Villegas
 * ZOOperstars
 * Allyanna
 * Spy Kids (TV)
 * Tropang Potchie

Shirt58 (talk) 13:55, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
— Berean Hunter   (talk)  14:08, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Indeffing and closing.

17 February 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Not sure about this, but the user's grammar and editing style appears to be consistent with Kat's. Blake Gripling (talk) 11:06, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Yunshui  雲 &zwj; 水  13:45, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
 * . On the other hand, the previous account in the archive, Dazey Villegas, is confirmed. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 14:03, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Closing without action per lack of evidence. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:11, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

23 February 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

A pattern of creating fictitious characters in ABS-CBN TV shows consistent with the Long-term abuse/Katrina Villegas case:
 * Hopia Legaspi - apparently a real actress but with no mention in the "Got to Believe" website
 * Alexander Diaz - now deleted (and please review this as I may well be wrong) - no mention of the character or actor of that name in the "Got to Believe" website
 * Jon Lucas (actor) - no mention of the character or actor of that name in the in the "Got to Believe" website

I really hate doing this.

Shirt58 (talk) Shirt58 (talk) 10:39, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Seems to be a bit of a departure from his usual target articles, and if he is indeed Kat this means he's been playing tricks on us earlier than we previously thought. The fact that he copy-pasted content into new articles appears consistent enough.

EDIT: Some of the articles this user created appear to refer to existing actors/actresses, but they don't seem to be notable enough to warrant an article. Blake Gripling (talk) 13:25, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
I'm endorsing the CU. Although I'm somewhat familiar with this master, I came across this latest report because of Shirt58's tagging of Hopia Legaspi as a hoax. I immediately thought of Katrina when I looked at the article, but according to IMDb, there really is an actress by that name with the same DOB and mostly the same credits. That seemed a little out of keeping for Katrina, but other things did not. I declined the hoax for the moment, although it can always be deleted per G5 depending on the CU.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:09, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
 * I was reluctant to run a check here because 1) this account has been around for six months without turning up here and 2) with all the checks that have been run, this account has not turned up there, either. That being said, the evidence here convinced me to check, but it turns out that it is that this is KV. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 17:11, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
 * No action taken based on CU. Bbb23 (talk) 01:09, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

26 February 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

New account creating articles concerning Filipino actors and actresses in the mode of KV (and persistently removing CSD templates). Note filmography wikilinks to articles that don't mention the subjects, as well as IMDB links that end up at IMDB articles unrelated to the subject of the article, very typical of KV.  Dwpaul  Talk   03:23, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The IP then proceeded to contest one of the CSD nominations, and also to blank one of the CSD-nominated pages; also has a lengthy history (in span of 2 days) of editing articles concerning TV shows on networks in the Phillipines.  Dwpaul  Talk   03:32, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Adding User:PinoyTVRecentUploaded who started editing similar articles a few days before PinoyCountdown. ''' Flat Out   let's discuss it   04:04, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

I'm certain that the three accounts are run by a single user, but the target articles seem to be contrary to the ones KV frequently dabbled with, i.e. child actors, although he/she had been messing with various other subjects before. The subjects referred to do exist based on a Google search, but they don't seem to be noteworthy of inclusion, unlike with KV churning out badly-written, copypaste hoaxes complete with mangled grammar and names combined from the first and last names of Filipino actors. I really can't say much about this, unless if for some reason Kat decided to switch to another modus operandi. Blake Gripling (talk) 09:22, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Aight, did a bit of checking and while the subjects do exist (albeit non-notable), the pages do reek of a typical Villegas hackjob - compare this with this somewhat verbatim article - the IRL Garcia KV is referring to is an actor, not an actress as what the article suggests. Blake Gripling (talk) 09:38, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
I'm ready to block based on behavior alone, but I have a question about the CU that was done about a day ago. It wouldn't have turned up PinoyCountdown because it was created after the CU, but if was looking for sleepers, which I assume he was, it should have turned up PinoyTVRecentUploaded, which was created on February 23. And given the likelihood that the two accountd are at least related to each other, I'm puzzled.

As an aside, some of the articles are obviously hoaxes. The names are real but the information in the articles isn't about that person or at least much of it isn't about that person, e.g., Emilio Garcia (which I just deleted myself) and Aileen Damiles. Garcia is a man, not a woman, and much older than the birth date given. Damiles never appeared in those movies. She was involved in the Miss Universe 1996 pageant, and I think the same person is an actress but hardly seven years old. I'm holding off endorsing a CU until I hear from DoRD.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:42, 26 February 2014 (UTC)


 * These are ✅ to one another, but they all appear ❌ to this case:
 * Given the large number of Philippine TV/movie/music editors, there are a number of possibilities as to who these could belong to, but I'm fairly certain that they aren't KV. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:36, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Given the large number of Philippine TV/movie/music editors, there are a number of possibilities as to who these could belong to, but I'm fairly certain that they aren't KV. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:36, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Given the large number of Philippine TV/movie/music editors, there are a number of possibilities as to who these could belong to, but I'm fairly certain that they aren't KV. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:36, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Given the large number of Philippine TV/movie/music editors, there are a number of possibilities as to who these could belong to, but I'm fairly certain that they aren't KV. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:36, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Given the large number of Philippine TV/movie/music editors, there are a number of possibilities as to who these could belong to, but I'm fairly certain that they aren't KV. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:36, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Given the large number of Philippine TV/movie/music editors, there are a number of possibilities as to who these could belong to, but I'm fairly certain that they aren't KV. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:36, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Given the large number of Philippine TV/movie/music editors, there are a number of possibilities as to who these could belong to, but I'm fairly certain that they aren't KV. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:36, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Given the large number of Philippine TV/movie/music editors, there are a number of possibilities as to who these could belong to, but I'm fairly certain that they aren't KV. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:36, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Given the large number of Philippine TV/movie/music editors, there are a number of possibilities as to who these could belong to, but I'm fairly certain that they aren't KV. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:36, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Given the large number of Philippine TV/movie/music editors, there are a number of possibilities as to who these could belong to, but I'm fairly certain that they aren't KV. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:36, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Given the large number of Philippine TV/movie/music editors, there are a number of possibilities as to who these could belong to, but I'm fairly certain that they aren't KV. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:36, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Given the large number of Philippine TV/movie/music editors, there are a number of possibilities as to who these could belong to, but I'm fairly certain that they aren't KV. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:36, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Given the large number of Philippine TV/movie/music editors, there are a number of possibilities as to who these could belong to, but I'm fairly certain that they aren't KV. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:36, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Given the large number of Philippine TV/movie/music editors, there are a number of possibilities as to who these could belong to, but I'm fairly certain that they aren't KV. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:36, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Given the large number of Philippine TV/movie/music editors, there are a number of possibilities as to who these could belong to, but I'm fairly certain that they aren't KV. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:36, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Given the large number of Philippine TV/movie/music editors, there are a number of possibilities as to who these could belong to, but I'm fairly certain that they aren't KV. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:36, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Given the large number of Philippine TV/movie/music editors, there are a number of possibilities as to who these could belong to, but I'm fairly certain that they aren't KV. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:36, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Given the large number of Philippine TV/movie/music editors, there are a number of possibilities as to who these could belong to, but I'm fairly certain that they aren't KV. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:36, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Given the large number of Philippine TV/movie/music editors, there are a number of possibilities as to who these could belong to, but I'm fairly certain that they aren't KV. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:36, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Given the large number of Philippine TV/movie/music editors, there are a number of possibilities as to who these could belong to, but I'm fairly certain that they aren't KV. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:36, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Given the large number of Philippine TV/movie/music editors, there are a number of possibilities as to who these could belong to, but I'm fairly certain that they aren't KV. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:36, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Given the large number of Philippine TV/movie/music editors, there are a number of possibilities as to who these could belong to, but I'm fairly certain that they aren't KV. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:36, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Given the large number of Philippine TV/movie/music editors, there are a number of possibilities as to who these could belong to, but I'm fairly certain that they aren't KV. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:36, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Given the large number of Philippine TV/movie/music editors, there are a number of possibilities as to who these could belong to, but I'm fairly certain that they aren't KV. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:36, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Given the large number of Philippine TV/movie/music editors, there are a number of possibilities as to who these could belong to, but I'm fairly certain that they aren't KV. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:36, 5 March 2014 (UTC)


 * For the record, though, I did block ✅ KV sock this morning on one of their usual ranges. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:39, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I've created Sockpuppet investigations/Maryank3 for that sock farm and tagged User:Patricia Villegas 123 as a confirmed sock of User:Katrina Villegas. Closing now. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:49, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

19 March 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Shirt58 noted in their deletion of Jasmine Villegas TV (Series) that the first account may be related to KV. The first account was subsequently blocked by Materialscientist. I ran across the second account and blocked it as an obvious sockpuppet of the first account due to the recreation of the page List of Stick Strike episodes. Both are blocked and both are obviously connected. I'm reporting here to clean up loose ends to see whose socks these are: KV's or if we have another person making up television shows. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:11, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Sleeper check. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 08:34, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅ plus . ​—DoRD (talk)​ 23:03, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I indeffed the sleeper and tagged all three accounts.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:09, 21 March 2014 (UTC)