Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kaulshikha/Archive

Report date March 31 2010, 14:01 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

Sequential SP accounts adding the same/similar spam to the same article: Kent Emmons. - Sinneed  14:01, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by - Sinneed


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users

Quack quack. Some of the accounts were already blocked and I got the rest. Master account blocked for two weeks, everyone's tagged. TN X Man 20:47, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


 * Conclusions

Report date April 21 2010, 15:02 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

It seems I did this wrong the 1st time. SPA adding similar spam to the same article. Quack. Possibly a meatpuppet/paid editor. - Sinneed  15:02, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by - Sinneed


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users

Rodgerdick is clearly a sock of Kaulshikha. Rogerdick's edits on April 9 are clear block evasion by Kaulshikha, which makes this a case of socking, not a serial account holder. Additionally, Kaulshikha seems not to be able to comprehend the idea that promoting Kent Emmonds is not the goal of Wikipedia. Indef for Rogerdick as a sock. Indef for Kaulshikha, which any admin can lift once Kaulshikha agrees to stick to one account and make no further edits to Kent Emmonds.
 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

Clerks should note that this got filed backwards (sock is named as master, master is named as sock) and file accordingly.&mdash;Kww(talk) 16:41, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

Note: This was originally opened here. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 17:05, 24 April 2010 (UTC)