Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kay Uwe Böhm/Archive

25 January 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Continued disruptive, gibberish edits to articles such as Radiation effects from Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster, Pebble bed reactor, Quasar, Neutron reflector. I know that IP3 there is clearly his style, and IP4 and 5 are confirmed to be him. I expect that the IPs available to him are too big a range to block, but requesting a check in any case to see. His main account is currently indefblocked. Syrthiss (talk) 17:51, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
There's not much I can tell you here. There only appears to be the one named account. The IPs you list (as you thought) are too spread out for one large rangeblock, although a smaller one would catch the last two. Have you considered semi-protection? (Also, none of this should be interpreted as checkuser confirmation of a link between the IPs and the named account.) TN X Man  18:48, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I've semied one of the articles. I don't know the status of the others.  The one I semied had been semied for a week previously, and he just came back when it was over and reinserted his stuff.  I was hoping that there would be an easy way to minimize his disruption and still allow other legitimate IP editors into the article.  I realize you cannot confirm the IPs.  Thanks. Syrthiss (talk) 18:59, 25 January 2012 (UTC)


 * 95.88.170.214 is already blocked, and the others are marginally stale enough that I'm hesitant to take further action. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 02:07, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

13 November 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

same name + 4, same edits on same pages. Barsoomian (talk) 15:30, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

13 November 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

same as Kay Uwe Böhm 4/, Kay Uwe Böhm 3, Kay Uwe Böhm 2 Barsoomian (talk) 18:34, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Everybody is blocked as blatantly obvious sockpuppets, but is a rangeblock possible? Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:38, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Rangeblock is not possible. CU can barely connect these to be the same people, and all three accounts are using new IPs each time beyond the /16 level. -- DQ  (ʞlɐʇ)  09:37, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

14 November 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

pretty obvious by now Barsoomian (talk) 12:44, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
— Berean Hunter   (talk)  00:07, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Blocked and closing.

17 April 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Inserting similar material, signed by sockpuppeteer in html comments. See Sockpuppet investigations/Kay Uwe Böhm. &mdash;&thinsp; H HHIPPO  19:38, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Already blocked, closing. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 15:07, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Blatant WP:DUCK: [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ATropical_cyclone&type=revision&diff=799636958&oldid=799617530 typical screed] about unrealistic weather modification projects, incoherent English. Jasper Deng (talk) 22:35, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Please see nl:Wikipedia:Checklijst langdurig structureel vandalisme/Kayuweboehm MoiraMoira (talk) 14:59, 19 December 2017 (UTC)