Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kaychanc/Archive

Evidence submitted by Acather96
Meatpuppertry. At 21:32, 3rd August, No to bike parking tax was created by Kaychanc. At 21:43 it was nominated for deletion by Marcus Qwertyus. Then at 21:54, the account Nitro1592 was created. Its first (and so far only) edit was to the deletion discussion (found here, and the diff). I do not think CheckUser is needed,because the evidence is quite conclusive Acather96 (talk) 11:03, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims. I'm unclear and still learning to use Wiki to edit (reading up on things currently) but I can assure you me and Kaychanc are two seperate people, feel free to do whatever you feel neccessary to prove me wrong. I understand that my account was created within minutes of the page being put up but that was merely so I could contribute, however I obviously don't have the skills as of yet to do so informatively and correctly. I saw the arguement for deletion and made a rash comment on as to why it was being deleted, as I didn't understand what the codes meant. I hope this helps in some way or another

Infact, do a check user on me please.

I'd also like to submit the following, a link to a post by Kaychanc as of yesterday http://forum.notobikeparkingtax.com/discuss/wbmc-4th-august-2010/?msg=33768 And a post by myself (slightly modified username as it's taken on wikipedia.) http://forum.notobikeparkingtax.com/discuss/northsouth-circ-run-for-the-l-platers/?msg=33781

Different topics but they are as of yesterday and shows we are two seperate users on the forum and in real life. Nitro1592 (talk) 12:05, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Comments by other users
As a member of the No To forum, I can assert that Nitro and Kaychanc are separate user IDs for two of the members on that site. I've met both of them at No To meeting, they are not the same person. Both have contributed to the "Shall we do a wikipedia page" thread on the forum. KroSha (talk) 13:22, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Could you please provide us a link so we can verify that? That would be greatly appreciated. –MuZemike 16:08, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Also note that we do not endorse CheckUser requests to "prove one's innocence". –MuZemike 17:47, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
I'm convinced that these are two separate people, given the links provided above. No action taken at this time as there is no socking going on here. –MuZemike 17:48, 5 August 2010 (UTC)