Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kenatics/Archive

05 April 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Sock account was created today has has the exact same interest as the master which is the article Ken Alfonso. The sock account hasn't edited any other article than this. &mdash;  LeoFrank  Talk 14:52, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Same naming convention with edits on same articles, since puppet master is blocked this looks to be a case of block evasion - McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 20:44, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Requests for "diffs" will prove fruitless as the master's contribution's have all been deleted. Admins will have to check deleted contributions not available to the nominator. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:20, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * -, please provide some WP:diffs to illustrate similarities in editing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  15:28, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Please, provide some WP:diffs of edits by the master and the sock, to illustrate their similarity.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:20, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I could link the entire user's contrib list if you like but that is already done by default. Solid Kenetics is a clear case of block evasion to the point of them recreating the article at Kennedy Alfonso. I am not requesting a checkuser.- McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 12:35, 7 April 2015 (UTC)


 * All are blocked and tagged. Closing the case.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  18:39, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

10 April 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Creation of Ken-Alfonso (trying to get around the fact that Ken Alfonso is now salted. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:09, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
. Admin needed to block.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  14:06, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I've blocked and tagged the sock, but it may be worthwhile to check for sleepers if anyone is so inclined. I think that this guy is an "edit as soon as the account is opened" type of editor, so odds are that there may not be any. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  14:32, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't think a sleeper check is all that necessary. The individual's topic of interest is very narrow, so I believe we have caught all the accounts for now. Mike V • Talk 05:20, 13 April 2015 (UTC)