Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kenny usa123/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Both users fighting hard to keep Nicholas Nixo Efthimiou. appears to have been created for the sole purpose of joining the argument. At the very least this is a case of WP:MEAT. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 15:11, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Also commented on my talk page: diff. User contributions show Vienolly has only edited the article in question as well as the AfD and Abrojunior's sole contributions are to talkpages of those supporting deletion as well as 2 incorrectly-placed "keep" votes . - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 17:53, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Original suspected master was Vienolly, but it turned out that Kenny usa123 (reported on 20 Aug 2016) was older. —  Rich wales (no relation to Jimbo) 05:44, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Closing. —  Rich wales (no relation to Jimbo) 06:03, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

See Articles for deletion/Nicholas Nixo Efthimiou and history of Nicholas Nixo Efthimiou. Numerous new SPAs. I checked IPs myself and the last seems to differ, but it may match with one of the accounts. Mr. Magoo (talk) 00:09, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Kenny usa123 was originally included here, but this account turned out to be the oldest in the batch, so I made it the suspected master. —  Rich wales (no relation to Jimbo) 05:44, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Closing. —  Rich wales (no relation to Jimbo) 06:03, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

The suspected sock puppets have been recently created with their only edits being to support keeping Nicholas Nixo Efthimiou which was created by Vienolly. At the very least this is a case of WP:MEAT but warrants investigation. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 18:53, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Procedural note - Given the fascination with Nicholas Efthimiou, all of these editors, including the "master account", are fairly clearly . (See SPI archive). As such, I would suggest merging this case into the Soccerumors case. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:52, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
, one of the accounts recently blocked by at the Soccerumors case, is ✅ to the Group 2 accounts.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:14, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Group 1 – the following accounts are ✅ to each other:
 * Group 2 – the following accounts are ✅ to each other and ❌ to Group 1:
 * Group 3 – the following accounts are to each other and Group 1, and ❌ to Group 2:
 * I've blocked the accounts in Groups 1 and 2. Based on the technical evidence, Groups 1 and 2 are separate masters. I recommend no action against Group 3 unless the behavioral evidence is strong, but bear in mind that the behavioral evidence is not as narrow as set forth in this case.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:31, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Group 2 – the following accounts are ✅ to each other and ❌ to Group 1:
 * Group 3 – the following accounts are to each other and Group 1, and ❌ to Group 2:
 * I've blocked the accounts in Groups 1 and 2. Based on the technical evidence, Groups 1 and 2 are separate masters. I recommend no action against Group 3 unless the behavioral evidence is strong, but bear in mind that the behavioral evidence is not as narrow as set forth in this case.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:31, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Group 2 – the following accounts are ✅ to each other and ❌ to Group 1:
 * Group 3 – the following accounts are to each other and Group 1, and ❌ to Group 2:
 * I've blocked the accounts in Groups 1 and 2. Based on the technical evidence, Groups 1 and 2 are separate masters. I recommend no action against Group 3 unless the behavioral evidence is strong, but bear in mind that the behavioral evidence is not as narrow as set forth in this case.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:31, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Group 3 – the following accounts are to each other and Group 1, and ❌ to Group 2:
 * I've blocked the accounts in Groups 1 and 2. Based on the technical evidence, Groups 1 and 2 are separate masters. I recommend no action against Group 3 unless the behavioral evidence is strong, but bear in mind that the behavioral evidence is not as narrow as set forth in this case.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:31, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Group 3 – the following accounts are to each other and Group 1, and ❌ to Group 2:
 * I've blocked the accounts in Groups 1 and 2. Based on the technical evidence, Groups 1 and 2 are separate masters. I recommend no action against Group 3 unless the behavioral evidence is strong, but bear in mind that the behavioral evidence is not as narrow as set forth in this case.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:31, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I've blocked the accounts in Groups 1 and 2. Based on the technical evidence, Groups 1 and 2 are separate masters. I recommend no action against Group 3 unless the behavioral evidence is strong, but bear in mind that the behavioral evidence is not as narrow as set forth in this case.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:31, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I've blocked the accounts in Groups 1 and 2. Based on the technical evidence, Groups 1 and 2 are separate masters. I recommend no action against Group 3 unless the behavioral evidence is strong, but bear in mind that the behavioral evidence is not as narrow as set forth in this case.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:31, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I've blocked the accounts in Groups 1 and 2. Based on the technical evidence, Groups 1 and 2 are separate masters. I recommend no action against Group 3 unless the behavioral evidence is strong, but bear in mind that the behavioral evidence is not as narrow as set forth in this case.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:31, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Closing. —  Rich wales (no relation to Jimbo) 06:03, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Another brand-new account opposing deletion on the same AFD? Seems legit. GABgab 17:41, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅ to the Group 2 socks above. Blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:53, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I've indef-blocked and tagged Abrojunior on behavioural evidence. —  Rich wales (no relation to Jimbo) 05:53, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Closing. —  Rich wales (no relation to Jimbo) 06:03, 10 September 2016 (UTC)