Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Keralean/Archive

01 March 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets






 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

User:Nashtam has been given till level - 4 warning for the 4 times destructive changes [], [], [], []. User:Nashtam account has been created only at 13:27, 29 February 2012. Within few minutes from another username User:Keralean started the same vandalism behaviour []. at the sametime(19:22, 29 February 2012), a new user User:Iteratededits has been created to do modifications on the same article. I saw a note from User:Nashtam to User:Castroby on User talk:Castroby which looks like an acknowledgement for request. When User:Nashtam has been created only at 13:27, 29 February 2012 how could User:Castroby could have discussed. Looks like User:Nashtam has been created with intention to do the vandalism behaviour. Information about User:Castroby is that the person has already did destructive changes few time back [|Editing-1], [|Editing-2], [|Editing-3]. I also suspect Sock puppetry on these 4 usernames and suspect User:Castroby is the main user. Sathishmls (talk) 06:40, 1 March 2012 (UTC) Sathishmls (talk) 06:40, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Today another username User:Nirmayam has been created to do the same vandalism behaviour. Sathishmls (talk) 14:33, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

My account is not a Sockpuppet account.I have been using this account for the past two years. I mainly remove un-sourced, non-third party citations and biased content from Wikipedia pages. The warnings issued in my page were raised by the user Sathishmls mainly because of disagreements on what is biased and what is not. I have received warnings from none except "Sathishmls" in the past two years nor have created multiple accounts. My name is dragged into this investigations because user Sathishmls is upset that I have removed content added by him, my edits are not destructive and I have given detailed explanation in the talk page of the article. I suspect user Sathishmls is an anti nuclear activist harassing everyone who is trying to make the page neutral. I kindly request the admins to read the discussion page in the article Koodankulam Nuclear Power Plant and my edits before taking any action.

Castroby (talk) 17:53, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Castroby hasn't been used in two months, but should still be viable. There is some sort of overlap here, so I'm endorsing to find out what's going on. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 20:44, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The bottom three are ✅ matches for each other. Castroby is not related, for what I can see. Courcelles 20:59, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
 * . I moved this case to show Keralean as the master. I blocked the latter two accounts in the first set, but with the new account listed, I'm relisting. These two edits are identical in wording, so this new account is almost certainly related. Relisting for confirmation and sleepers. I've not blocked the master yet, but.. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 06:03, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
 * ✅ the following are the same:
 * TN X Man 14:43, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Tamilcore, Iteratededits and Nashtam have all been blocked per the findings. I've blocked the master for a week for socking. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 04:35, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
 * TN X Man 14:43, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Tamilcore, Iteratededits and Nashtam have all been blocked per the findings. I've blocked the master for a week for socking. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 04:35, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Tamilcore, Iteratededits and Nashtam have all been blocked per the findings. I've blocked the master for a week for socking. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 04:35, 6 March 2012 (UTC)