Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Keremmaarda/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
Out of 16 edits made by Göktuğ538538, only one has not been on an article Keremmaarda has also edited. 

in the Siege of Krujë (1467) article, Göktuğ538538 added  something which Keremmaarda had said during an edit explanation, with extremely similar wording

Both use the term resources for sources, ,.

I believe the behavioral evidence is enough, however I am also requesting a CU if the behavioral evidence I have provided is not enough. Durraz0 (talk) 10:01, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


 * I have nothing to do with Göktuğ and Rome account, you can check it from the IP address. This is my only Wikipedia account. Keremmaarda (talk) 21:49, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Technically, but I think two different devices (whether that's two different people, well...) fits the evidence best. No real surety either way here.  Courcelles (talk) 17:01, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Seem to be two different people on account of contrasting edits such as and . Noting Göktuğ has been indefinitely blocked for edit-warring since the report was filed. Closing without further action. DatGuyTalkContribs 18:55, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Total history falsification: Keremmaarda claim that the famous Siege of Belgrade 1456 (which stopped 70 years the Ottoman advance and the noon bell came from here) was a Pyrrhic victory and the Turks defeated the Christians: User talk:OrionNimrod: Keremmaarda and  Rome99   make exactly the same history falsification edit, and again:

OrionNimrod (talk) 22:08, 23 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi @Courcelles, @Durraz0, maybe this is not the correct format, but I write you because in the Sockpuppet investigations page "Keremmaarda" is closed case. However I opened more cases because he continue to deface the articles with many account with the same edits. OrionNimrod (talk) 22:58, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

What? I don't even know these people. We are not the same person. Overvecht3301 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 07:21, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Rome99 is ❌ to Keremmaarda or any of the other accounts mentioned in this SPI. Instead, Rome99 is ✅ to . I've created a pro forma report at Sockpuppet investigations/Germanicus44. Closing this section without further action. Mz7 (talk) 08:08, 20 September 2023 (UTC)