Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Keshavv1234/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets

 * User_talk:Keshavv1234 and User_talk:Keshavv1234 - Keshavv1234 has been topic-banned from India articles for edit warring on Durga article on August 2. Jagdish's activity starts on August 6.
 * Shailaputri and other Navadurga artciles - -  restoration of Keshav's version where the goddesses are said to be forms of Durga, not Mahadevi, , , Jagdish's edits to Keshav's last edits (before ban), which reverted by admin User:Seraphimblade


 * Durga - reinstatement of Keshav's views as Durga as Supreme and use of generic Hindu goddess names in Durga article


 * edit summary as "Update" similar to Keshav   Redtigerxyz  Talk 13:01, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * While there are a couple of differences which give me pause; the timing, edit content and edit summaries warrant a check. - Please compare the two accounts. --Jack Frost (talk) 22:43, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Salvio 23:08, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Given the CU result, the similarity in interest and behavior, and the timing of account creation, I've blocked as a sockpuppet and extended the block on the master to indefinite. Seraphimblade Talk to me 23:27, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
 * --Jack Frost (talk) 23:37, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Blocked user appears to have resorted to editing same pages, with mostly the same changes, as they were disrupting before the block. Vaishno Devi (where they reverted my previous edit), Durga, Parvati, Bhavani, all appear to be getting editing by Keshavv1234 from IPs. Andrew Englehart (talk) 02:24, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
 * If this turns out to be the same user, can these articles be protected from IP edits? Andrew Englehart (talk) 02:25, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * It's probably them, however they've not edited on either range (103.154.26.0/24 or 103.199.226.0/24) in over two weeks. Closing. If they pop up again, and their actions are blatantly disruptive, then consider reporting to AIV instead; the response time will be far quicker than SPI. Jack Frost (talk) 06:28, 4 September 2022 (UTC)