Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ketshalom12/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Bookworm7122 created their account approximately 7 minutes after I tagged Ketshalom12's article Yitzchak Etshalom for deletion under A7 (CA and diff, respectively) and then shortly thereafter contested the speedy tag to this article (Diff). About 5 minutes later, SimanTovM created their account, also to contest the speedy deletion request (CA and Diff, respectively). This strikes me as pretty duckish socking or meat-puppetry for all of these new users to take a sudden interest in an otherwise unremarkable article. OhKayeSierra (talk) 23:05, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Could be sock, could be meat, but brand-new accounts showing up to contest a speedy on a similarly new page is quite ducky. socks, master blocked for a week. GeneralNotability (talk) 01:40, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Same grammar mistakes, caring about the same page, same ignoring of WP format, same novice hood to wikipedia, and suddenly walks into an AfD, of all things. Ketshalom12 has a conflict of interest on this article and has created sockpuppets in the past. Theleekycauldron (talk) 19:03, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

They also both use the phrase "contest deletion" - a phrase for speedy deletion, which Ketshalom12 created two sockpuppets for and learned the phrase from there. Theleekycauldron (talk) 19:07, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

They also both, after a few days of inactivity on the AfD, put in their comments in improper format and similar grammar at essentially the same time. Theleekycauldron (talk) 19:12, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - There's no doubt Sycolo is a sock. The very first thing they did, for example, is remove a maintenance template on the now-deleted Yitzchak Etshalom.  The only reason I'm asking for CU is because looking at the history here, it seems likely there will be more socks in the future and having the CU-confirmed trail back to the master will be useful for future investigations.  Not to mention there's probably some sleepers we haven't found yet. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:19, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Also found and ✅:
 * Bagging and tagging all accounts. . This SPI can be closed.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   18:00, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Also found and ✅:
 * Bagging and tagging all accounts. . This SPI can be closed.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   18:00, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Bagging and tagging all accounts. . This SPI can be closed.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   18:00, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Bagging and tagging all accounts. . This SPI can be closed.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   18:00, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Bagging and tagging all accounts. . This SPI can be closed.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   18:00, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Bagging and tagging all accounts. . This SPI can be closed.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   18:00, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Bagging and tagging all accounts. . This SPI can be closed.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   18:00, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Bagging and tagging all accounts. . This SPI can be closed.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   18:00, 15 March 2021 (UTC)