Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Keyser Sözetigho/Archive

25 May 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

I picked this up at WP:COIN - looking at the contribution histories of these two accounts I felt it was worthwhile bringing it here. Dougweller (talk) 20:22, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

They both seem to stay largely focused on the same subjects, which arouses my suspicion. Shakinglord (talk) 20:24, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Meat or sock? -- DQ  (t)   (e)  20:33, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ match. TN X Man  15:01, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Blocked and tagged the sock, but left the master alone as he's involved in that COIN discussion. (Having said that, I'm not opposed to a block here.) —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 15:28, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

26 May 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Recently was discovered to be a sockpuppeteer of a user link1914. The puppet was recently blocked for that reason. Now this new user shows up, and makes the same post: as Link1914 and as MXIVMwatch. Tiggerjay (talk) 20:48, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
match. TN X Man 22:26, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Wonderful. Blocked and tagged; blocked the master 3 months. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 23:34, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

31 May 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

User Keyser S. has created at least 2 confirmed sockpuppet accounts to make contributions to the NXIVM and Keith Raniere Wiki pages (Link1914 and NXIVMwatch) and was subsequently blocked for them. Another username Fairsfair7 has been recently created and has only made edits on the Keith Raniere discussion page (the actual page is protected due to edit warring), has made posts with the same exact tone as Keyser's previous posts, and whose user name is a favorite phrase of Keyser (him and Link1914 consistenly used "Fair is fair" in their posts and edit comments. Keyser was initially blocked for 1 month for sockpuppeting and afterwards made another sockpuppet account and was later blocked for 3 months, so it is not possible for me to compare any recent edits of his to that of Fairsfair7 but I have included the short history of contributions for that Fairsfair7, NXIVMwatch, Keyser S., and Link1914 as evidence:

Fairsfair7:

08:21, 31 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:Keith Raniere ‎ (→Village Voice: new section) 08:10, 31 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:Keith Raniere ‎ (→New York Observer) 08:03, 31 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:Keith Raniere ‎ (→New York Observer: new section) 07:56, 30 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:Keith Raniere ‎ (→VANITY FAIR: new section)

The same type of edits were made by Keyser S.:

00:28, 26 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:NXIVM ‎ 18:15, 25 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:NXIVM ‎ (→NPOV for NXIVM, Keith Raniere) 18:13, 25 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:NXIVM ‎ (→NPOV for NXIVM, Keith Raniere) 18:12, 25 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:NXIVM ‎ (→NPOV for NXIVM, Keith Raniere) 18:11, 25 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:NXIVM ‎ (→NPOV for NXIVM, Keith Raniere) 15:18, 25 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:Keith Raniere ‎ (→Removing MacIntosh cites) 15:16, 25 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:NXIVM ‎ (→Sourcing of material) 15:11, 25 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:NXIVM ‎ (→Arguments for exclusion of Novello from list) 15:10, 25 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:NXIVM ‎ (→Controversial Material) 13:07, 25 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:Keith Raniere ‎ 02:07, 25 May 2011 (diff | hist) m Talk:Keith Raniere ‎ (→NPOV) 02:03, 25 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:Keith Raniere ‎ (→NPOV) 01:59, 25 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:Keith Raniere ‎ (→NPOV) 01:56, 25 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:Keith Raniere ‎ (→Questioned Neutrality) 22:14, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Keith Raniere ‎ 22:06, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:Keith Raniere ‎ (→Another note about "self-promotion") 22:05, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:Keith Raniere ‎ (→Another note about "self-promotion") 22:04, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:Keith Raniere ‎ (→Questioned Neutrality) 22:00, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:NXIVM ‎ (→Controversial Material) 22:00, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:NXIVM ‎ (→Uncited material) 21:56, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:NXIVM ‎ (→Controversial Material) 21:56, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:NXIVM ‎ (→Controversial Material) 21:54, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:Keith Raniere ‎ (→Which part of the warnings didn't you all get?) 21:53, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:Keith Raniere ‎ (→Which part of the warnings didn't you all get?) 21:43, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) m NXIVM ‎ (grammer) 16:15, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Keith Raniere ‎ (These are the father who has a fiscal intrest in NXIVM claims.When you make outlandish claims the burden is on you) 16:08, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:NXIVM ‎ (→Arguments for exclusion of Novello from list) 16:05, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:NXIVM ‎ (→Sourcing of material) 16:02, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Keith Raniere ‎ (They have proven nothing it is an unverified claim>Wiki is not free advertising) 16:01, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Keith Raniere ‎ (They have proven nothing it is an unverified claim>Wiki is not free advertising) 15:59, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Keith Raniere ‎ (Deleted supposed posting on a forum in violation of Wikipedia verifiability rule and violates npov. Self-promoting and never been proven, source quotes Raniere father not verifiable source. They are highly biased and nothing but free advertising.) 15:56, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Keith Raniere ‎ (Deleted supposed posting on a forum in violation of Wikipedia verifiability rule and violates npov. Self-promoting and never been proven, source quotes Raniere father not verifiable source. They are highly biased and nothing but free advertising.) 15:56, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Keith Raniere ‎ (Deleted supposed posting on a forum in violation of Wikipedia verifiability rule and violates npov. Self-promoting and never been proven, source quotes Raniere father not verifiable source. They are highly biased and nothing but free advertising.) 15:55, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Keith Raniere ‎ (Deleted supposed posting on a forum in violation of Wikipedia verifiability rule and violates npov. Self-promoting and never been proven, source quotes Raniere not verifiable source. They are highly biased and nothing but free advertising.) 15:55, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Keith Raniere ‎ (Deleted supposed posting on a forum in violation of Wikipedia verifiability rule and violates npov. Self-promoting and never been proven, source quotes Raniere father not verifiable source. They are highly biased and nothing but free advertising.) 15:53, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Keith Raniere ‎ (Deleted supposed posting on a forum in violation of Wikipedia verifiability rule and violates npov. Self-promoting and never been proven, source quotes Raniere himself not verifiable source. They are highly biased and nothing but free advertising .) 15:40, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) NXIVM ‎ (Irrelevant and why is a "likely" reason listed) (Tag: references removed) 14:46, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Keith Raniere ‎ (Deleted supposed posting on a forum in violation of Wikipedia verifiability rule and violates npov. Self-promoting and never been proven, source quotes Raniere himself and NXIVM websitesnot verifiable source) 14:37, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Keith Raniere ‎ (Deleted supposed posting on a forum in violation of Wikipedia verifiability rule and violates npov. Self-promoting and never been proven, source quotes Raniere himself not verifiable source) 14:31, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) NXIVM ‎ (convicted felon) 14:29, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Keith Raniere ‎ (Deleted supposed posting on a forum in violation of Wikipedia verifiability rule) 01:52, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Clare Bronfman ‎ (he was commenting on there secretcy) 01:50, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Clare Bronfman ‎ (he was commenting on there secretcy) 01:48, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Sara Bronfman ‎ (he was commenting on there secretcy) 01:33, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Keith Raniere ‎ (in fairness all other quotes were written by raniere himself) 01:24, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) m Keith Raniere ‎ 21:28, 23 May 2011 (diff | hist) NXIVM ‎ (Important part of all meetings from how to lose 100 million) 21:23, 23 May 2011 (diff | hist) Keith Raniere ‎ (important info) 21:21, 23 May 2011 (diff | hist) m NXIVM ‎ 21:20, 23 May 2011 (diff | hist) NXIVM ‎ (You cannotuse a frome surgeon general as a refence for a ethical training program without the fact she went on to pled to a felony,just not fair if you want to take her name off go ahead) 02:25, 23 May 2011 (diff | hist) m NXIVM ‎ 02:24, 23 May 2011 (diff | hist) NXIVM ‎ (Shows it receives public funds for operations) 02:23, 23 May 2011 (diff | hist) NXIVM ‎ (No visitors are welcome including the press) 02:20, 23 May 2011 (diff | hist) NXIVM ‎ 02:18, 23 May 2011 (diff | hist) NXIVM ‎ (quote from one you quote from the other. fair is fair) 02:14, 23 May 2011 (diff | hist) m NXIVM ‎ (correct name) 02:06, 23 May 2011 (diff | hist) m NXIVM ‎ 02:05, 23 May 2011 (diff | hist) NXIVM ‎ (In fairness you can't use one and ignore the other that would be unbalanced) 02:02, 23 May 2011 (diff | hist) NXIVM ‎ (The correct quote was "Yeah, I think it's a cult," Not cult like) 01:43, 23 May 2011 (diff | hist) Keith Raniere ‎ 01:41, 23 May 2011 (diff | hist) Keith Raniere ‎ 01:26, 23 May 2011 (diff | hist) Clare Bronfman ‎ 00:43, 23 May 2011 (diff | hist) Sara Bronfman ‎ 00:42, 23 May 2011 (diff | hist) Sara Bronfman ‎ (Tag: references removed) 00:40, 23 May 2011 (diff | hist) Sara Bronfman ‎ 00:36, 23 May 2011 (diff | hist) Sara Bronfman ‎ (Andrews, Suzanna (November 2010). "The Heiresses and the Cult" page 1) 00:31, 23 May 2011 (diff | hist) m Clare Bronfman ‎ (more than one is correct) 00:30, 23 May 2011 (diff | hist) Clare Bronfman ‎ (Alleged by Barbara J. Bouchey is a fact and clears up who made the claim. Disgruntled is conjecture as to her mental state and is speculative at best) 00:29, 23 May 2011 (diff | hist) Sara Bronfman ‎ (Alleged by Barbara J. Bouchey is a fact and clears up who made the claim. Disgruntled is conjecture as to her mental state and is speculative at best) 00:25, 23 May 2011 (diff | hist) NXIVM ‎ (just trying to be fair) 00:21, 23 May 2011 (diff | hist) m NXIVM ‎ (more than one is correct) 00:20, 23 May 2011 (diff | hist) NXIVM ‎ (Alleged by Barbara J. Bouchey is a fact and clears up who made the claim. Disgruntled is conjecture as to her mental state and is speculative at best) 00:03, 23 May 2011 (diff | hist) m Keith Raniere ‎ (and barred Mr.Raniere from ever operating a chain distributor scheme in the State of New York was part of the consent order) 00:02, 23 May 2011 (diff | hist) Keith Raniere ‎ 20:47, 22 May 2011 (diff | hist) NXIVM ‎ (It was part of the judment just trying to be fair and he did sign it,read for yourself) 20:42, 22 May 2011 (diff | hist) NXIVM ‎ (→Controversies: she called it a cult, she did not compare to cult) 20:37, 22 May 2011 (diff | hist) User talk:U21980 ‎ (→Hi boss) 20:34, 22 May 2011 (diff | hist) NXIVM ‎ (In trying to be fair nowhere in the story is it proven as extortion. Bouchey would have been charged with a crime if it wasextortion) 20:29, 22 May 2011 (diff | hist) User talk:U21980 ‎ 20:27, 22 May 2011 (diff | hist) User talk:U21980 ‎ 20:21, 22 May 2011 (diff | hist) Keith Raniere ‎ 20:13, 22 May 2011 (diff | hist) NXIVM ‎ 20:12, 22 May 2011 (diff | hist) NXIVM ‎ 20:08, 22 May 2011 (diff | hist) Keith Raniere ‎ 20:06, 22 May 2011 (diff | hist) Keith Raniere ‎ 20:04, 22 May 2011 (diff | hist) Keith Raniere ‎ 20:04, 22 May 2011 (diff | hist) Keith Raniere ‎ 20:02, 22 May 2011 (diff | hist) Keith Raniere ‎ 01:06, 22 May 2011 (diff | hist) m NXIVM ‎ 01:05, 22 May 2011 (diff | hist) m NXIVM ‎ 01:04, 22 May 2011 (diff | hist) m NXIVM ‎ 01:03, 22 May 2011 (diff | hist) NXIVM ‎ 00:53, 22 May 2011 (diff | hist) NXIVM ‎ 00:44, 22 May 2011 (diff | hist) m NXIVM ‎ 00:40, 22 May 2011 (diff | hist) NXIVM ‎ 00:35, 22 May 2011 (diff | hist) NXIVM ‎ 00:32, 22 May 2011 (diff | hist) m NXIVM ‎ 00:31, 22 May 2011 (diff | hist) m NXIVM ‎ 00:28, 22 May 2011 (diff | hist) m NXIVM ‎ 00:27, 22 May 2011 (diff | hist) m NXIVM ‎ 00:25, 22 May 2011 (diff | hist) m NXIVM ‎ 00:24, 22 May 2011 (diff | hist) NXIVM ‎ 00:14, 22 May 2011 (diff | hist) m Keith Raniere ‎ 00:10, 22 May 2011 (diff | hist) m NXIVM ‎ 00:09, 22 May 2011 (diff | hist) NXIVM ‎ 00:02, 22 May 2011 (diff | hist) m NXIVM ‎ 23:21, 21 May 2011 (diff | hist) NXIVM ‎ 23:17, 21 May 2011 (diff | hist) NXIVM ‎ 23:16, 21 May 2011 (diff | hist) Keith Raniere ‎ 14:02, 21 May 2011 (diff | hist) m Keith Raniere ‎ 14:01, 21 May 2011 (diff | hist) m NXIVM ‎ 14:00, 21 May 2011 (diff | hist) m NXIVM ‎ 13:57, 21 May 2011 (diff | hist) NXIVM ‎ 13:56, 21 May 2011 (diff | hist) Keith Raniere ‎ 03:41, 21 May 2011 (diff | hist) m Clare Bronfman ‎ 03:39, 21 May 2011 (diff | hist) m Keith Raniere ‎ 03:39, 21 May 2011 (diff | hist) m Keith Raniere ‎ 03:38, 21 May 2011 (diff | hist) m Keith Raniere ‎ 03:37, 21 May 2011 (diff | hist) m Keith Raniere ‎ 03:36, 21 May 2011 (diff | hist) m Keith Raniere ‎ 03:35, 21 May 2011 (diff | hist) Keith Raniere ‎ 03:33, 21 May 2011 (diff | hist) NXIVM ‎ 03:09, 21 May 2011 (diff | hist) NXIVM ‎ 03:07, 21 May 2011 (diff | hist) Keith Raniere ‎ 03:06, 21 May 2011 (diff | hist) Sara Bronfman ‎ 03:04, 21 May 2011 (diff | hist) Clare Bronfman ‎ 02:56, 21 May 2011 (diff | hist) Keith Raniere ‎ 02:53, 21 May 2011 (diff | hist) Keith Raniere ‎ 02:51, 21 May 2011 (diff | hist) NXIVM ‎ 02:42, 21 May 2011 (diff | hist) m NXIVM ‎ 23:41, 20 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:Keith Raniere ‎ (→Nys Office Of The Attorney General consent order that shutdown CBL: new section)

Keyser S. only contributed to pages that dealt with NXIVM members, such as Raniere and the Bronfmans. Link1914 and NXIVMwatch had the same issue:

Link1914: 19:52, 25 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:NXIVM ‎ (→NPOV for NXIVM, Keith Raniere) 18:00, 25 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:Keith Raniere ‎ (→Details about citations) 17:55, 25 May 2011 (diff | hist) m Talk:NXIVM ‎ (→NPOV for NXIVM, Keith Raniere) 17:53, 25 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:NXIVM ‎ (→NPOV for NXIVM, Keith Raniere) 17:44, 25 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:Keith Raniere ‎ (→NPOV) 17:43, 25 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:Keith Raniere ‎ (→Which part of the warnings didn't you all get?) 17:38, 25 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:Keith Raniere ‎ (→Removing MacIntosh cites) 17:30, 25 May 2011 (diff | hist) m Talk:Keith Raniere ‎ (→NPOV) 03:04, 25 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:Keith Raniere ‎ (→Details about citations) 02:58, 25 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:NXIVM ‎ (→Sourcing of material) 02:39, 25 May 2011 (diff | hist) m Talk:Keith Raniere ‎ (→Questioned Neutrality) 02:33, 25 May 2011 (diff | hist) m Talk:Keith Raniere ‎ (→NPOV) 02:32, 25 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:Keith Raniere ‎ (→Questioned Neutrality) 02:30, 25 May 2011 (diff | hist) m Talk:Keith Raniere ‎ (→Which part of the warnings didn't you all get?) 01:16, 25 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:NXIVM ‎ (→Sourcing of material) 01:12, 25 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:Keith Raniere ‎ (→Questioned Neutrality) 00:51, 25 May 2011 (diff | hist) Keith Raniere ‎ (wiki link) 00:50, 25 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:Keith Raniere ‎ (→Another note about "self-promotion") 00:49, 25 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:Keith Raniere ‎ (→NPOV) 00:48, 25 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:Keith Raniere ‎ (→Questioned Neutrality) 00:37, 25 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:NXIVM ‎ (→Uncited material) 00:35, 25 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:NXIVM ‎ (→Controversial Material) 00:26, 25 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:NXIVM ‎ (→Controversial Material) 00:24, 25 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:NXIVM ‎ (→Arguments for exclusion of Novello from list) 00:23, 25 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:NXIVM ‎ (→Arguments for exclusion of Novello from list) 00:13, 25 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:Keith Raniere ‎ (→NPOV) 23:55, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:Keith Raniere ‎ (→Questioned Neutrality) 23:23, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:NXIVM ‎ (→Uncited material) 23:20, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:NXIVM ‎ (→Uncited material) 23:20, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:NXIVM ‎ (→Uncited material) 23:13, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:NXIVM ‎ (→Arguments for exclusion of Novello from list) 23:12, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:NXIVM ‎ (→Arguments for exclusion of Novello from list) 23:07, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:NXIVM ‎ (→Uncited material) 23:06, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:NXIVM ‎ (→Controversial Material) 23:05, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:NXIVM ‎ (→Controversial Material) 23:04, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:Keith Raniere ‎ (→Which part of the warnings didn't you all get?) 23:03, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:Keith Raniere ‎ (→Another note about "self-promotion") 23:01, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:Keith Raniere ‎ (→Another note about "self-promotion") 23:00, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:Keith Raniere ‎ (→NPOV) 22:52, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:Keith Raniere ‎ (→Another note about "self-promotion") 22:51, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:Keith Raniere ‎ (→Questioned Neutrality) 22:51, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:NXIVM ‎ (→Uncited material) 22:50, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:NXIVM ‎ (→Sourcing of material) 22:42, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) User talk:Link1914 ‎ (→Reporting edits to Administrator) 22:39, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:NXIVM ‎ (→Controversial Material) 22:38, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:NXIVM ‎ (→Uncited material) 22:38, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:NXIVM ‎ (→Sourcing of material) 22:36, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:Keith Raniere ‎ (→Another note about "self-promotion") 22:34, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:Keith Raniere ‎ (→Which part of the warnings didn't you all get?) 22:33, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) User talk:Link1914 ‎ (→Reporting edits to Administrator) 17:56, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) m NXIVM ‎ (JEANE MacINTOSH is a reputable source her story ran in the largest circulatiion newspaper in America) 17:28, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) m Keith Raniere ‎ (JEANE MacINTOSH is a reputable source her story ran in the largest circulatiion newspaper in America) 17:23, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) m NXIVM ‎ (JEANE MacINTOSH is a reputable source her story ran in the largest circulatiion newspaper in America) 17:16, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Keith Raniere ‎ (Direct Quote from New York Post a paper that has been referenced a thousand times on Wiki.) 17:11, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) NXIVM ‎ (JEANE MacINTOSH is a reputable source her story ran in the largest circulatiion newspaper in America) 17:08, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Keith Raniere ‎ (JEANE MacINTOSH is a reputable source her story ran in the largest circulatiion newspaper in America) 16:46, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:Keith Raniere ‎ (→Another note about "self-promotion") 16:41, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) NXIVM ‎ (Calls for speculation not needed or necessary) (Tag: references removed) 16:39, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) NXIVM ‎ (felon not cited violates NPOV) 16:33, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Keith Raniere ‎ (self promotting violates NPOV the burden is on NXIVM to prove such outlandish claims) 16:31, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Keith Raniere ‎ (self promotting violates NPOV the burden is on NXIVM to prove such outlandish claims) 16:30, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Keith Raniere ‎ (self promotting violates NPOV) (Tag: references removed) 16:25, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Keith Raniere ‎ (JEANE MacINTOSH is a reputable source her story ran in the largest circulatin newspaper in America) 03:27, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Sara Bronfman ‎ (important for balance) 03:12, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Clare Bronfman ‎ 03:07, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Clare Bronfman ‎ (important for balance) 03:00, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) NXIVM ‎ 02:58, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) NXIVM ‎ 02:55, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) NXIVM ‎ 02:48, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) m Sara Bronfman ‎ 02:47, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Sara Bronfman ‎ 02:43, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Clare Bronfman ‎ 02:42, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Clare Bronfman ‎ (reference) 02:34, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Clare Bronfman ‎ (reference) 02:30, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Sara Bronfman ‎ 02:28, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Sara Bronfman ‎ (refernce) 02:19, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Keith Raniere ‎ (important for balance) 02:16, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Keith Raniere ‎ (important for balance) 02:09, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Clare Bronfman ‎ (this was very contoversial i was there) 02:07, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Sara Bronfman ‎ (in fareness it was not all good and was never held again) 00:44, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) NXIVM ‎ 00:41, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) NXIVM ‎ (important) 00:28, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) m NXIVM ‎ 00:28, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) NXIVM ‎ (this is their vision) 00:06, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) NXIVM ‎ 00:02, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) m Keith Raniere ‎ 00:02, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Keith Raniere ‎ 00:00, 24 May 2011 (diff | hist) Keith Raniere ‎ 23:53, 23 May 2011 (diff | hist) NXIVM ‎ (important) 23:49, 23 May 2011 (diff | hist) Keith Raniere ‎ (important) 23:20, 23 May 2011 (diff | hist) NXIVM ‎ (impossable) 22:54, 23 May 2011 (diff | hist) NXIVM ‎ (you can't just call her the SG without saying she is a convicted criminal,) 22:25, 23 May 2011 (diff | hist) m NXIVM ‎ 22:24, 23 May 2011 (diff | hist) NXIVM ‎ (I am from NY and the women is a criminal if you want to list her as "surgeon general" it is only fair to point out she is a felon)

NXIVMwatch:

19:48, 26 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:Keith Raniere ‎ (→Link1914 is Keyser) 19:45, 26 May 2011 (diff | hist) User talk:JamesChambers666 ‎ (→Link1914 is Keyser) 19:32, 26 May 2011 (diff | hist) Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard ‎ (→NXIVM, NPOV, COI, violations of WP:Good Faith, abusive language, for NXIVM, Keith Raniere) 19:22, 26 May 2011 (diff | hist) m Talk:NXIVM ‎ (→Link1914 is Keyser) 19:20, 26 May 2011 (diff | hist) User talk:NXIVMwatch ‎ (→May 2011) 19:19, 26 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:Keith Raniere ‎ (→Link1914 is Keyser) 19:18, 26 May 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:NXIVM ‎ (→Link1914 is Keyser) 19:15, 26 May 2011 (diff | hist) NXIVM ‎ (Gives testament to her charater as much as being a fromer surgeon general)

Given the prior circumstances, the familiarity in tone between the users, and the username, and exclusive edits to the Raniere page (the NXIVM page is on a week break from all editors), would it be possible to run an investigation on this to confirm this link? Thanks for your help!

08:21, 31 May 2011 (diff U21980 (talk) 19:25, 31 May 2011 (UTC)


 * I apologize for the format of this request (the contributions looking so cluttered), I am unsure of how to clean it up to make it look more presentable. Thanks again!U21980 (talk) 19:32, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * If Keyser is continuing to evade his block, we may need to take more drastic measures. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 20:40, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
 * is ❌ to Keyser. I didn't see evidence of any other socking by Keyser or Faisfair7. TN X Man  11:24, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Alright then, closing with no action taken. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 12:28, 1 June 2011 (UTC)