Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kidhackr/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Both users have created pages with no context, the primary subjects between them being Inah Estrada and Ang Huling Isang Heart Lovesick, including draftspace edits. Both users have also disruptively edited pages related to French singers and one of a Filipino television actor, including possible vandalism. Requesting CheckUser for ta possible connection between these accounts. Jalen D. Folf  (talk)  00:30, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The behavioural evidence is strong enough here, that a check is not necessary. . Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:42, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

. Username is quite similiar to previous sock JaidenYosh. Apart from that, Sockmaster and this account frequently edit Patrick Fiori, Hélène Ségara and Angelika Dela Cruz (See Editor Interaction Analyser). 94rain Talk  02:51, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
The following accounts are ✅ to the master:
 * TonyBallioni (talk) 00:26, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
 * SQL Query me! 01:30, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
 * SQL Query me! 01:30, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
 * SQL Query me! 01:30, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
 * SQL Query me! 01:30, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Jaidenmala is very likely a repeat of the other listed socks which have already been blocked as clones of this puppet-master. I included those names in the list only to make the editor interaction utility work. This edit to the talk page of is what got my attention. Note that draft: pages do not show up in the Editor Interaction Utility, please check the page's edit history for evidence. This account also edited and  as did some of the other already-blocked accounts listed above. WP:DUCK. davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)  19:04, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Seems WP:DUCKy. Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 20:47, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Edit history of pretty much says it all, JaidenLalo, JaidenMama, and Kidhackrd are known puppets. That, and the similarity of the username. Recommend checking for sleepers, it was weeks between the start of editing and this account being used to carry on a previous puppet's work. If the sleeper check is declined, there is no need for a checkuser, this is WP:DUCKy enough. davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)  20:21, 24 October 2020 (UTC)  Update Editor attempted to move an active AFD but was blocked by the edit filter.  Editor also blanked the AFD page, which another editor reverted.  Editor also removed AFD template from an article, which was also reverted.  davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)  01:36, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - sock is already blocked, endorse for sleeper check per filer. GeneralNotability (talk) 15:46, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
 * , for what it's worth, the IP ranges and UAs involved don't make for the most obvious sleepers, so we may be stuck finding these on behaviour.   Maxim (talk)  22:22, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Blocked by NJA. -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 19:30, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

WP:DUCK per last blocked sockpuppet (User:JaidenABS-CBN). Also edited the similar articles that the sockpuppet have edited before being blocked. - WayKurat (talk) 17:24, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * JaidenABS-CBN3 indefinitely blocked based on behavioral evidence related to both Kidhackr and JaidenABS-CBN. --   LuK3      (Talk)   19:35, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

WP:DUCK per username (see recently blocked sock User:JaidenABS-CBN3) and editing behavior (adding mostly hoax information on Philippine television related articles). - WayKurat (talk) 08:06, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Both have been blocked and tagged separately. Close. Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 21:06, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

In this seventh episode, the sockpuppeteer posts messages on people's talk pages (1, 2, 3), again asking people to add Fillipines (and a bunch of other countries) as a debuting Eurovision country. Different approach, but the same goal and the same username; WP:DUCK. &horbar;Jochem van Hees (talk) 10:16, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Jaiden's ABS-CBN 7 as a suspected sock of Kidhackr. --    LuK3      (Talk)   11:02, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Ducks based on username and Jaiden's ABS-CBN 8 contacting WayKurat. CU to confirm and see what other accounts are in the farm, there are a bunch of new creations from the past month. Eostrix  (&#x1F989; hoot hoot&#x1F989;) 15:25, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - I both of the reported accounts. I'll let a clerk or CU determine if a sleeper check is necessary. --    LuK3      (Talk)   15:32, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
 * ✅. A number of accounts also came up that were already blocked, but the following has not yet been: ., closing. Mz7 (talk) 00:15, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

WP:DUCK per username. Most recent blocked socks are User:Jaiden's ABS-CBN 8 and User:JaidenABS-CBN4. A few minutes after reporting this SPI, User:Jaiden ABS-CBN 11 appeared and reverted back the edits of User:Jaiden's ABS-CBN 11 and they left a very sweet message in my talk page. Please check for sleeper accounts as this vandal is known to create multiple accounts upon detection. - WayKurat (talk) 02:39, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * These two accounts are ✅ to each other and very to previously confirmed socks. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 13:53, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Not 100% sure, also because it's been a while, but this person is doing exactly the same thing as previously (creating articles such as Phillipines in the Eurovision Song Contest). Maybe checkuser could confirm? &horbar;Jochem van Hees (talk) 22:50, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Most of the socks in the archive were stale; the ones I was able to check were . However, given other similarities, I have no doubt this is the same person. Blocking, tagging, closing.  Girth Summit  (blether)  12:30, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

WP:DUCK per username and edits. &horbar;Jochem van Hees (talk) 19:11, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Duck or not, where there is one there are sleepers. Asking for A CU check please. Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 20:48, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
 
 * - Username and area of interest are similar enough to warrant a CU and sleeper check. --Jack Frost (talk) 12:14, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I would say to  who was blocked on behavioural evidence. TonyBallioni (talk) 05:41, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
 * A duck, even without CU. I shall block. JBW (talk) 09:27, 23 November 2021 (UTC)