Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/KimberleyKitten/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Both accounts created on the same day, with edits restricted to Richard Baker (British businessman, born 1962). made an edit, which was quickly reverted. Another account that was earlier made their first edit to the page, which was basically the same edit as the previous account. Both accounts are being used to make a point. Requesting CU. Ashley yoursmile!  04:09, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''


 * Would it make sense to include in the investigation Richard Andrew Baker, who was adding similar content to the article before a soft block by Beeblebrox earlier this month? —jameslucas ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄  04:32, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . Same country, different ranges and user agents. Geolocation isn't helpful in this instance. That's all I can really give you.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   02:59, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * KimberleyKitten is ✅ to, although that in itself is not a violation of the sockpuppetry policy because the Richard Andrew Baker account was merely soft-blocked, which allows them to create an account with a more appropriate username. I would probably say Luke1hopewell is a different person, but based on their behavior, it seems like they have a WP:COI of some sort, although they have denied this . It is possible this is WP:MEAT. For now, I've given both accounts {{subst:uw-agf-sock}}. I don't think I'll give any blocks, but if the accounts continue to be problematic, it may be a good idea to raise a concern at WP:COIN or some other noticeboard. Closing. Mz7 (talk) 21:44, 28 February 2021 (UTC)