Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/King Sunpiper/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
Each user, excepting King Vidgelo, has made unsourced edits to the number of Red Robin locations within minutes of creating the account, the vast majority of which have been quickly reverted in Pending Changes Review:
 * King Sunpiper created, King Sunpiper contributions
 * King Vidgelo created, King Vidgelo contributions
 * King Lightning The Cat created, King Lightning The Cat contributions, at Red Robin,  at Red Robin
 * Queen Zxayn created, Queen Zxayn contributions, at Red Robin
 * Queen Wonkerx created, Queen Wonkerx contributions, at Red Robin
 * Queen Butterrollx created, Queen Butterrollx contributions, at Red Robin
 * Queen Vincentx created, Queen Vincentx contributions, at Red Robin

Each of the "King" accounts has also made one edit each to Bob Evans Restaurants, also shortly after account creation. — Jkudlick &#x2693; (talk) 17:36, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - this is bizarre. Please check for others. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 19:40, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
 * . --Blablubbs (talk) 20:37, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
 * At this scale, the account-hopping itself is inherently disruptive, even setting aside the edit warring. Also noting . the lot. Closing.  --Blablubbs (talk) 20:46, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
 * At this scale, the account-hopping itself is inherently disruptive, even setting aside the edit warring. Also noting . the lot. Closing.  --Blablubbs (talk) 20:46, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
 * At this scale, the account-hopping itself is inherently disruptive, even setting aside the edit warring. Also noting . the lot. Closing.  --Blablubbs (talk) 20:46, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
 * At this scale, the account-hopping itself is inherently disruptive, even setting aside the edit warring. Also noting . the lot. Closing.  --Blablubbs (talk) 20:46, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
 * At this scale, the account-hopping itself is inherently disruptive, even setting aside the edit warring. Also noting . the lot. Closing.  --Blablubbs (talk) 20:46, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
 * At this scale, the account-hopping itself is inherently disruptive, even setting aside the edit warring. Also noting . the lot. Closing.  --Blablubbs (talk) 20:46, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
 * At this scale, the account-hopping itself is inherently disruptive, even setting aside the edit warring. Also noting . the lot. Closing.  --Blablubbs (talk) 20:46, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
 * At this scale, the account-hopping itself is inherently disruptive, even setting aside the edit warring. Also noting . the lot. Closing.  --Blablubbs (talk) 20:46, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
 * At this scale, the account-hopping itself is inherently disruptive, even setting aside the edit warring. Also noting . the lot. Closing.  --Blablubbs (talk) 20:46, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
 * At this scale, the account-hopping itself is inherently disruptive, even setting aside the edit warring. Also noting . the lot. Closing.  --Blablubbs (talk) 20:46, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
 * At this scale, the account-hopping itself is inherently disruptive, even setting aside the edit warring. Also noting . the lot. Closing.  --Blablubbs (talk) 20:46, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
 * At this scale, the account-hopping itself is inherently disruptive, even setting aside the edit warring. Also noting . the lot. Closing.  --Blablubbs (talk) 20:46, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
 * At this scale, the account-hopping itself is inherently disruptive, even setting aside the edit warring. Also noting . the lot. Closing.  --Blablubbs (talk) 20:46, 6 February 2023 (UTC)