Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kintetsubuffalo/Archive

Report date January 22 2009, 22:12 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

Gadget850 (Ed) Chris (クリス • フィッチ)

These accounts are some of the multiple acounts used by one person - creating false and incorrect information on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Organization_of_Russian_Scouts_(Scouts-in-Exile). Hostile edits and comments are unwarranted and are an attempt to attack the Organisation - NORS, not mentioning that these actions by supposed "scouts" is not scouting. Legitimate attempts have been made to present correct information regarding NORS. There has been no contact made by these "users" to ascertain whether or not information is correct or verifiable (as of 22/01/2009). I have made direct contact with NORS and have been charged by the World Chief Russian Scout and the current Australian Chief to correct the information (as of 22/01/2009). Beetlejuice 87 (talk) 22:23, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by Beetlejuice 87 (talk)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.

The accounts don't exist, it looks like the users' signatures were added instead of the usernames. They refer to (an administrator) and, both established users with accounts created in 2005. There doesn't appear to be any evidence of sockpuppetry here, and the only visible edit to that article by Gadget850 is the addition of a template, using AWB. — Snigbrook 22:58, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Comments by other users


 * If I may comment; it looks like a new user has ownership issues with an article. After three edits that went against the Mos, Gadget850 and Kintetsubuffalo bother appear to have tried to explain why the user's edits were incorrect and this case is some ventilation of anger/due to incompetence of our structure? This is a content dispute at most and doesn't belong here. §hep   •  Talk  21:06, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

no evidence whatsoever of socking. Reporter has WP:COI and WP:OWN issues on an article and being unfamiliar with policy has assumed that the fact that more than one editor is opposing his WP:OR additions means that there is socking. Other users have explained the position. Anything further can be dealt with elsewhere, no SPI issues to deal with Mayalld (talk) 21:22, 26 January 2009 (UTC) page renamed to stop the bot breaking Mayalld (talk) 21:39, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


 * Conclusions