Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kittenpow/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

As background, has been reverting on Elizabeth Swaney, removing sourced content which he or she considers "not neutral". She has been blocked (by me) for it, and since then I have considerably expanded the article. Following the block expiry he or she came back and did the same, I reverted, and warned on the article talk page. Miraculously a new user, Shamrock 1888 has come along and their first edit is the exact same thing. This seems pretty duck-like to me, but I would like a CU run to confirm. Examples are in the history, but for those who don't want to look, compare this to this. kelapstick(bainuu) 22:23, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Also may or may not be interested, as they have taken part in discussion on the talk page. --kelapstick(bainuu) 22:26, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - One edit isn't a whole lot to go on, but I think there's enough here to warrant a check. Please check to confirm sockpuppetry. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:04, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅, blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:49, 28 March 2018 (UTC)