Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kittychew/Archive

28 November 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

162.254.144.149 was blocked for edit warring/disruptive behavior like this. The IP appears to have returned as Blarpkin to evade their block and continue edit warring, see this revision. Very DUCKish, so I don't believe CU is necessary. Seahorseruler (Talk Page) (Contribs) 05:55, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Darkventus appears to be another sockpuppet, as less than a minute after Blarpkin's last undo, Darkventus made a completely unrelated edit to the same page, seemingly to try to prevent Blarpkin's edit from being reverted. Seahorseruler  (Talk Page) (Contribs) 01:30, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Warring continues under 77.93.204.79 with this revision. -- Seahorseruler (Talk Page) (Contribs) 02:32, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Darkventus removed a message from 162.254.144.149's talk page, making it seem even more likely that they are the same person. Seahorseruler  (Talk Page) (Contribs) 05:24, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm starting to notice an alarming amount of IPs acting similarly, see the page history of List of programs broadcast by Nickelodeon. I have a feeling we dealing with something bigger. Seahorseruler  (Talk Page) (Contribs) 05:33, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * This may be related to the blocked, who was blocked for basically being an SPA regarding Nick Studio 10.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 10:13, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
. Actually, Kittychew was blocked for abusing multiple accounts. The case was opened, as this one initially was, as an IP master, Sockpuppet investigations/50.149.225.14. However, there were no other named accounts, so naturally there was no CU done. I'd like to sort out the named accounts here and see what technical relationships there are, if any. The IPs are more obvious than the named accounts, and I've semi-protected the article.--Bbb23 (talk) 05:38, 29 November 2014 (UTC) I've indeffed and tagged Blarpkin. The other named account was already blocked and tagged. I've tagged Kittychew. Although the two IPs geolocate to different continents, based on duck, I blocked them each for two weeks. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:10, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The two accounts are indeed . . -- DQ   (ʞlɐʇ)  05:51, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

15 May 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

First edit was to once again change the Nick Studio 10 ending line the same as KC has in the past; obviously not here to do much else.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 06:29, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Kittychew and all previous socks are, so you have to provide strong behavioral evidence. Please, provide diffs of edits made by Vendykins and of edits made by Kittychew (or previous socks) and explain their similarity.  Vanjagenije   (talk)  18:08, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I've blocked Vendykins based upon behavior. The user made the same style of edit (show was cancelled) as past accounts and IPs (50.149.225.14, Blarpkin, 162.254.144.149, Kittychew). Mike V • Talk 00:57, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

03 July 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Same disruptive behavior on Nick Studio 10. Very obvious DUCK. See Diff 1 vs Diff 2 and Diff 3. Seahorseruler (Talk Page) (Contribs) 03:22, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

User is now partaking in 'revert on other articles because you reported me' behavior here, here and here; an attempt to stop them at AIV was ignored.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 00:24, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Looks like a duck to me. Adding a content on the cancellation of Nick Studio 10 seems to be the common thread of all the socks. Aside from the above difs:. TDL (talk) 02:19, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
 * New sock blocked indef. Closing case. Someguy1221 (talk) 10:21, 6 July 2015 (UTC)