Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kjangdom/Archive

14 August 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Nearly identical edit summaries. Compare Kjangdom's edit summary where he says: to Audrey37's edit summaries where he says
 * "Removing Dodin quote - this article is not about the NKT!!!"
 * "Removing NKT reference - this article is not about the NKT!"
 * "Removing second NKT reference - this article is not about the NKT!"VictoriaGrayson (talk) 20:01, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Requesting check for sleepers.VictoriaGrayson (talk) 22:50, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

The point of sockpuppetry is using two accounts at the same time. But the kjangdom account is not in use anymore. Check out the talk page on the kjangdom account. There is nothing wrong with switching accounts :) Audrey37 is a nice username with a more broad / vague description on the talk page. Cheers ;) Audrey37 (talk) 13:15, 15 August 2014 (UTC)


 * May also be worth watching which  has also been editing the same cluster of pages. Chris Fynn (talk) 06:03, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Added CU request per my talk page. -- DQ   (ʞlɐʇ)  20:27, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * is a ✅ sock of, along with . It is very that these are all .--Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots  22:42, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * , there is no separate check for sleepers; they become apparent during a regular check as long as they are on the same IP/range the CU was run on.--Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 23:00, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia's policies regarding the use of multiple accounts does not allow you to simply stop using one account and start using another in order to continue editing the same topics when your edits have proven to be contentious and where you have not disclosed the connection between your accounts. This gives the appearance of creating a new account to evade scrutiny (see WP:CLEANSTART and WP:VALIDALT, specifically "Clean-start accounts should not return to old topic areas or disputes, editing patterns, or behavior previously identified as problematic, and should be careful not to do anything that looks like an attempt to evade scrutiny"). In addition, you continued to use the Kjangdom account to file a retaliatory SPI report against VictoriaGrayson after you created and began using the Audrey37 account, which is violation of Wikipedia's policies regarding the use of multiple accounts. I've therefore blocked the Kjangdom account indefinitely so that you can no longer use it in conjunction with the Audery37 account. Please only use the Audrey37 account moving forward.--Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 16:22, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Regarding, the results are at best.--Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots  20:30, 18 August 2014 (UTC)