Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Klaksonn/Archive

Report date March 4 2009, 22:32 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Evidence submitted by → AA (talk) —

→ AA (talk) — 22:32, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
 * See previous RFCU & SSP cases plus block log
 * Edit warring on similar articles using newly opened accounts from same range of IP addresses.
 * There was quite a farm of sockpuppets identified during the last RFCU and I would not be surprised if that was the case again.


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users

Requested by → AA (talk) — 22:32, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
 * CheckUser requests


 * - Tiptoety  talk 20:29, 6 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

The following are ✅ as (or an impersonator): I noticed that was blocked as a sockpuppeteer last week. This is in fact. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 22:59, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Conclusions
 * Are you sure you meant as that account does not exist.  Tiptoety  talk 23:07, 8 March 2009 (UTC)


 * All blocked and tagged with the exception of of course.  Tiptoety  talk 23:16, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry, ignore that one. Also ✅, , , and . Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 23:33, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Blocked and tagged those too. Tiptoety  talk 23:36, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Report date March 13 2009, 16:41 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Evidence submitted by Phil153 (talk)

Like other Klaksonn socks,

first edits are to Edoardo_Agnelli, same type of edit summaries, same content being restored. Obvious sock, won't even bother with notification. Phil153 (talk) 16:41, 13 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users

All blocked for other reasons and suspected of being each other puppets. Move to close.  Syn  ergy 23:07, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


 * Conclusions

Report date April 16 2009, 17:49 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Evidence submitted by Ben Ben (talk)

is back again on Edoardo Agnelli see and  with the same stuff he brought in as --Ben Ben (talk) 17:49, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * user:Hippocrates44
 * user:Klakky
 * user:Beta321!
 * or ... or


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


 * Conclusions


 * I hear ducks. Obvious sock, already blocked. ~ fl 02:58, 20 April 2009 (UTC)