Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kolins/Archive

15 May 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Basic proof both are one and the same: both edit almost exclusively in Equatorial Guinea football/footballers. More proof both are one and the same: the latter started editing IMMEDIATELY after the former was blocked, on 11 December 2012.

Got this one that will uncover the holder of the new account pronto, in Sérgio Marakis, as he removed the PORTUGUESE FOOTBALLERS category like he used to do in several other articles (man says he's South African only, period! See here http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=S%C3%A9rgio_Marakis&diff=554356159&oldid=552783636). I was only hoping to bring small diffs when i started this message but this one is serious serious stuff, i remember he was repeatedly confronted in the past, not only did he not reply but he continues with said behaviour, the removal of one nationality the footballer has, when both categories should remain per consensus. Here is proof of the same done by Kolins (please see here http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=David_Zurutuza&diff=508869779&oldid=499504002).

Small diffs? Watch as Frontieres, as Kolins before him (here http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Javier_Balboa&diff=prev&oldid=429021926), do not add the title of a reference to save his life (Frontieres doing it here http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Yago_Alonso-Fueyo_Sako&diff=537122033&oldid=534250984). Also in Javier Balboa, watch as Kolins (like Frontieres) writes no summary and removes important info (even if he is right to correct Balboa's international goals, see here http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Javier_Balboa&diff=526241700&oldid=525184390 - if he is correct, then why no summary?).

Attentively, thank you for your attention --AL (talk) 14:01, 15 May 2013 (UTC) AL (talk) 14:01, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Kolins has not edited since December 2012 and is not blocked. If MonFrontieres is a sock, his only violation is evasion of a 1-week block, so given that Kolins is not active (making MonFrontieres), taking action against MonFrontieres would be punitive. Let's treat Kolins as an abandoned account for now and re-report if he starts editing using that account again. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 22:27, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
 * So, i suppose his continuing violation of community consensus (i.e. category removal) is seen as OK? --AL (talk) 23:11, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
 * All I'm saying is that the statute of limitations has passed for sockpuppetry has passed. You could pretend the current scenario happened this way: He got caught back then, sock got indeffed, and the master's block was temporary. The master decides he prefers the sock username, so he requests a username change to switch around the accounts. In response to your present question, these concerns should be raised at WP:ANI, not here. -- King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 03:11, 16 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks King, keep up the good work --AL (talk) 11:28, 16 May 2013 (UTC)