Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Koraent/Archive

28 September 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

The multiple accounts listed above are being operated by the same user. All of the sock accounts listed above were created on September 28. The Best life music and Sat-B articles created by the user are not notable. The IP and Koraent have contacted me in the past requesting that I create the Best Life Music article. I told them that the group wasn't notable to have a stand alone article. The user does not understand Wikipedia's policies and doesn't know that opening multiple accounts for an improper use is a violation.  V e r s a c e 1 6 0 8   (Talk) 14:26, 28 September 2014 (UTC)  V e r s a c e 1 6 0 8    (Talk) 14:26, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

I believe the Korabdi account is being operated by the same user. It was created on October 4 and has only made contributions to the Sat-B and Best Life Music articles. Update: I was able to find reliable sources on Sat-B. However, Best Life Music fails Wikipedia's notability requirements.  V e r s a c e 1 6 0 8   (Talk) 04:33, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Koraburundi, TeamSatura, Iamburundian, Blm burundi have been blocked by Yunshui. I've also blocked Korabdi indefinitely and the master account for a week. In regards to the IP, it hasn't edited recently and has likely been reassigned by now. Mike V  •  Talk  01:54, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

11 October 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

I had a conversation with Kentbdi and he confirmed to be a sock puppet of Koraent. I advised him to go back to using his original account but he told me that he doesn't remember his first account. He also promised not to additional accounts again. He didn't know he was violating Wikipedia's policies. Hopefully he keeps his promises. I believe this account should be block per policy. Since he doesn't remember his first account, what account should he used to edit?  V e r s a c e 1 6 0 8   (Talk) 14:37, 11 October 2014 (UTC)  V e r s a c e 1 6 0 8    (Talk) 14:37, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * I'll ping, who will know exactly what to do in this case. WK, I believe the comment referred to above is this one. Drmies (talk) 01:11, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * As the block on the Koraent account has expired, is there any reason that they cannot continue editing via the preferred account as long as they clearly link the two accounts and completely abandon the Koraent identity? -- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots  21:16, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Ok, I've gone ahead and blocked the account (with autoblock disabled) and notified them that they can (only) use the  account moving forward. -- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots  19:05, 7 November 2014 (UTC)-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots  19:05, 7 November 2014 (UTC)