Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Krisvstudios/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

After master’s soft block user JoeyHursler was registered and recreated master’s work Christopher George Vincent under different title Kris vincent and after it’s deletion user ElizaSaffron was registered and recreated it as Kris Vincent (capital “V”) and then again after Ritchie333 deleted the article user SpaceGuy1000 was registered and repeated the same thing. Thank you – GSS (talk |c|em ) 10:27, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - As per identical versions created of the same article (at least for the 3 alleged socks). Thanks, GABgab 01:59, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 11:31, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
 * - Since the first block was a soft block, their second account created was legitimate. After that, it was sockpuppetry. There are two courses of action here: 1) indeffing everyone, 2) indeffing the two accounts but blocking JoeyHursler for a lesser duration. It's your choice here. Thanks, GABgab 12:35, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I've indeffed all three. I'll leave it to you to decide how to tag this, . I would go with the account created immediately after the soft block as the master, but you have more experience with this. Article also salted. ~ Rob 13 Talk 22:53, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
 * This situation rarely happens, but we generally tag the oldest account. GABgab 00:54, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yeah, completely up to you. It doesn't really matter. I've also upgraded the soft block to a hard block. ~ Rob 13 Talk 01:21, 30 June 2017 (UTC)