Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Krzyzowiec/Archive

Krzyzowiec

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Evidence submitted by M0RD00R

User:Krzyzowiec banned for one year pending this discussion is back under new username User:DumnyPolak

Evidence

 * 1.Similar scope of the articles - Poland and European far right, Catholicism.


 * 2.Similar edits by Krzyzowiec and DumnyPolak on war rape: (Krzyzowiec), (DumnyPolak).


 * 3. Similar arguments regarding some fringe Polish neo-Nazi group: ONR members can't be Nazi because their ancestors fought nazis (Krzyzowiec), How it is a 'neo-nazi movement' when it is related to the pre war organization which fought the Nazis?!) (DumnyPolak)


 * 4.Similar incivil attacks on opponents stop spreading your hateress among normal and patriotic people. (Krzyzowiec), Stop POVing the article with your anti-Catholic hateress (DumnyPolak)


 * 5.IP 151.204.133.206 active during Krzyzowiec block displayed similar behaviour characteristics: similar topics, similar soapboxing and racial innuendoes at talk pages

Keeping in mind a history of racially charged soapboxing like this, by DumnyPolak, IP 151.204.133.206  and openly racist edits previously by Krzyzowiec, indef should be considered I guess. M0RD00R (talk) 09:10, 16 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


 * Conclusions


 * The obvious sock account has been blocked. Jehochman Talk 12:44, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you. And BTW shouldn't block evasion result in sock puppeteer's original block being reset? M0RD00R (talk) 13:26, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

25 January 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Return to perrenial edit warring at National Radical Camp (1993) (revision history; please note: user Kaskusia made 17 reverts since January 12, 2013 without summaries, in a slow-mo edit war with several long-term users including admins); see also: talk page warning by Drmies, talk page warning by Diannaa. Thanks, Poeticbent talk 18:50, 25 January 2013 (UTC) — An indef block was already  proposed in 2008 by EdJohnston. Poeticbent talk  18:50, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Krzyzowiec's edits are long, so there's nothing for CU to compare against. Any determination will have to be made on behavioral evidence alone. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 20:51, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Seems pretty clear. Indefing both sock and master due to persistent disruption. Tagging and closing. Rschen7754 09:26, 30 January 2013 (UTC)