Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ksjdfhlaksjdfhlaksjdfh/Archive

16 April 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

All of the socks quoted are SPAs which have been editing Our Lady of Victories Church, Somwarpet before and after nomination for deletion. Some of the socks here may or may not be socks of the master, but they could be related to the user of the master, which will also be reported to UAA for violation of username policy for promotion of a company. Socks 1 to 4 follow a similar naming convention of garbage. I believe that other SPAs that have been editing the same article may be related to the master user or could be socks themselves, but since I do not have any evidence of that, I have chosen not to quote them, however the article revision history is small and all its editors can easily be seen. Optakeover (U)(T)(C) 05:02, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Please, compare those accounts.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  16:02, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Group 1 – the following accounts are ✅ to each other:
 * Group 2 – is  to Group 1.
 * Group 3 – the following accounts are ❌ to each other and to Groups 1-2:
 * I've blocked the accounts in Group 1 without tags. I leave the rest of the decisions up to the clerk.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:55, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Not making a formal request for admin, but it looks very likely that that Ajfdpiuhi is a sock of some sort. Subbuvincent, although suspicious, with the CU result and no obvious connection, shouldn't be blocked at the moment. Kevin ( aka L235 ·&#32; t ·&#32; c) 22:08, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Ajfdpiuhi blocked, and all tagged. Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  19:10, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I've blocked the accounts in Group 1 without tags. I leave the rest of the decisions up to the clerk.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:55, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Not making a formal request for admin, but it looks very likely that that Ajfdpiuhi is a sock of some sort. Subbuvincent, although suspicious, with the CU result and no obvious connection, shouldn't be blocked at the moment. Kevin ( aka L235 ·&#32; t ·&#32; c) 22:08, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Ajfdpiuhi blocked, and all tagged. Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  19:10, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Not making a formal request for admin, but it looks very likely that that Ajfdpiuhi is a sock of some sort. Subbuvincent, although suspicious, with the CU result and no obvious connection, shouldn't be blocked at the moment. Kevin ( aka L235 ·&#32; t ·&#32; c) 22:08, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Ajfdpiuhi blocked, and all tagged. Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  19:10, 26 April 2016 (UTC)